{"id":"W2066864520","doi":"10.1353/jge.2001.0024","title":"Assessing the Effectiveness of Critical Thinking Instruction","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of General Education","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":332,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Critical thinking; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03539022870594901,"score_gpt":0.4163020330242313,"score_spread":0.3809118043182823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."},"direct_labels":[],"classifier":{"requested":true,"available":true,"version":"metacan-v1-d91a1de5be90","frame_rows_covered":4299418,"decision_targets":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","randomized_trial","nonrandomized_trial","observational","systematic_review","meta_analysis","case_report","qualitative","simulation_or_modeling","bench_or_experimental","theoretical_or_conceptual","not_applicable"],"score_encoding":"uint16_le_65535","score_resolution":0.000015259021896696422,"interpretation":"Scores imitate each teacher on the enriched screening sample; they are not calibrated prevalence probabilities for the full frame.","warning":null},"prediction":{"classifier_version":"metacan-v1-d91a1de5be90","candidate_union":["observational","theoretical_or_conceptual"],"consensus_intersection":["observational","theoretical_or_conceptual"],"score_encoding":"uint16_le_65535","score_resolution":0.000015259021896696422,"scores":{"codex":{"metaresearch":0.0032806897077897307,"metaepi_narrow":0,"metaepi_broad":0,"bibliometrics":0.0018616006713969636,"sts":0.00022888532845044633,"scholarly_communication":0.0009308003356984818,"open_science":0.000015259021896696422,"research_integrity":0.00039673456931410697,"randomized_trial":0.00015259021896696422,"nonrandomized_trial":0.000015259021896696422,"observational":0.026245517662317846,"systematic_review":0.0002136263065537499,"meta_analysis":0.00009155413138017853,"case_report":0.000030518043793392844,"qualitative":0.000503547722590982,"simulation_or_modeling":0.00015259021896696422,"bench_or_experimental":0.0002746623941405356,"theoretical_or_conceptual":0.05613794155794614,"not_applicable":0.014908064393072405,"design_other":0.16302738994430457},"gemma":{"metaresearch":0.00665293354695964,"metaepi_narrow":0,"metaepi_broad":0.000015259021896696422,"bibliometrics":0.0010376134889753567,"sts":0.000686655985351339,"scholarly_communication":0.000045777065690089265,"open_science":0.00006103608758678569,"research_integrity":0.0009002822919050889,"randomized_trial":0.00010681315327687495,"nonrandomized_trial":0.000030518043793392844,"observational":0.2943923094529641,"systematic_review":0.0026245517662317848,"meta_analysis":0.000030518043793392844,"case_report":0.000045777065690089265,"qualitative":0.002609292744335088,"simulation_or_modeling":0.00010681315327687495,"bench_or_experimental":0.00009155413138017853,"theoretical_or_conceptual":0.964415960936904,"not_applicable":0.003143358510719463}},"interpretation":"Scores imitate each teacher on the enriched screening sample; they are not calibrated prevalence probabilities for the full frame."}}