{"id":"W2067075599","doi":"10.1016/j.aca.2008.08.031","title":"Ultraviolet resonance Raman spectroscopy as a robust spectroscopic tool for in situ sunscreen analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytica Chimica Acta","topic":"Skin Protection and Aging","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Chemistry; Ultraviolet; Raman spectroscopy; Resonance Raman spectroscopy; In situ; Ultraviolet visible spectroscopy; Spectroscopy; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Nuclear magnetic resonance; Optoelectronics; Optics; Chromatography; Organic chemistry; Astronomy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002448986,0.0002609301,0.0006967534,0.0006231535,0.0001594638,0.00003375484,0.0001881246,0.0001262261,0.0004457423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000315814,0.0002405063,0.0003889819,0.00153056,0.0001154712,0.000109774,0.00003149267,0.000382127,0.00004983336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001892351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001480603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001004684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001573116,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979926,0.00004458074,0.0004746617,0.0006116471,0.0003191214,0.0005573798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998925,0.0001338885,0.0001178003,0.000579849,0.00007750431,0.0001659139],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001675835,0.001087534,0.2535368,0.0001182249,0.001441835,0.0002903097,0.0008496805,0.00001855533,0.7313989,0.001301124,0.007959368,0.0003218086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006487891,0.0008353465,0.7667694,0.0002433508,0.001900873,0.0002239373,0.0002189149,0.006944956,0.2071329,0.0007149913,0.00776199,0.0007654509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852048,0.00003547958,0.0007831737,0.004371875,0.0000494823,0.0007514132,0.000009229749,0.0001082196,0.008686353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896355,0.0002043423,0.005285753,0.001277975,0.0002281518,0.00005827204,0.00006657214,0.00003423935,0.003209164],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5242661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9807562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02227260759719937,"score_gpt":0.2877246798768091,"score_spread":0.2654520722796097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}