{"id":"W2067136511","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.03.013","title":"A review of attraction and repulsion models of aggregation: Methods, findings and a discussion of model validation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecological Modelling","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Aggregate (composite); Computer science; Attraction; Representation (politics); Data science; Perception; Data aggregator; Field (mathematics); Focus (optics); Sparrow; Artificial intelligence; Ecology; Econometrics; Epistemology; Mathematics; Geography; Nanotechnology; Physics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002510909,0.002025148,0.003459698,0.003173701,0.0004739901,0.002076262,0.00384154,0.002098088,0.002322117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004457308,0.0008583284,0.001224418,0.006116894,0.00120685,0.002884063,0.001061967,0.001722417,0.002007583],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001677466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002646007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005635267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005188815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993652,0.0001720406,0.0001031768,0.0001369898,0.0001964876,0.00002615731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969429,0.002286033,0.0001930368,0.000124924,0.0003882562,0.00006477277],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008265526,0.0001629199,0.0006685605,0.03358672,0.0002426942,0.0001926578,0.0001557993,0.01894191,0.001601259,0.04880668,0.04189213,0.853666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005181371,0.0002164243,0.001817816,0.0120583,0.0005046607,0.00126645,0.0001694802,0.01294641,0.001635337,0.06374266,0.9053819,0.0002086643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046067,0.9868515,0.009925285,0.000629458,0.0003685237,0.00001584899,0.0001418688,0.00005183862,0.001554987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002745508,0.9881798,0.007788804,0.0002516068,0.000283906,0.000040009,0.0001224406,0.00002169087,0.0005661454],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005635267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01327908,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2410638561871926,"score_gpt":0.3712188261444819,"score_spread":0.1301549699572892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}