{"id":"W2067139866","doi":"10.1007/s00355-003-0303-1","title":"Friedman, Harsanyi, Rawls, Boulding – or somebody else? An experimental investigation of distributive justice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Distributive justice; Distributive property; Inequality; Veil of ignorance; Quarter (Canadian coin); Inequity aversion; Ignorance; Social welfare function; Economic Justice; Microeconomics; Welfare; Social psychology; Welfare economics; Psychology; Mathematics; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002084685,0.0001441421,0.0002271496,0.00003893821,0.001759544,0.00007896278,0.0001533428,0.0001289019,0.0001820424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005903988,0.0001469447,0.00005401151,0.0001397692,0.0006088178,0.0007279519,0.00008837022,0.0001111953,0.000006003805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002767091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007207579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002429544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002374648,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989059,0.000104289,0.0002411267,0.0002606612,0.0001968738,0.0002911492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995189,0.0000492877,0.0001508867,0.00007564757,0.0000713017,0.0001339845],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002511804,0.0007116844,0.1439443,0.0001182303,0.0001633316,0.000007456915,0.5607057,0.000005706366,0.07245895,0.2047634,0.003589195,0.01328084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002391193,0.0005230203,0.1002553,0.00005968229,0.0003050491,0.000001487142,0.7448336,0.00002414493,0.08918234,0.001239475,0.06008262,0.001102067],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914714,0.0004751159,0.000002490964,0.003083125,0.0001775684,0.0002374552,0.00008289313,0.0000564305,0.004413573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985952,0.00005293817,0.0001523438,0.0001932043,0.0007302873,0.00003160347,0.0000426457,0.00001376727,0.0001879878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.203524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05767738450091642,"score_gpt":0.3749618746046674,"score_spread":0.317284490103751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}