{"id":"W2067205028","doi":"10.1177/1534735407309482","title":"Assessing the Role of Evidence in Patients' Evaluation of Complementary Therapies: A Quality Study","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Integrative Cancer Therapies","topic":"Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Feeling; Scientific evidence; Medicine; Health care; Alternative medicine; Qualitative research; Evidence-based medicine; Quality (philosophy); Family medicine; Information needs; Information seeking; Newspaper; Psychology; Social psychology; Pathology; Advertising; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.4781949,0.0005446995,0.00393735,0.01196247,0.003736521,0.01057933,0.00264708,0.002402027,0.003435711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.730671,0.001319486,0.004469466,0.01759134,0.006759483,0.009798772,0.008078497,0.002515066,0.0001961967],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02063873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02441375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008392171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01050497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3926545,0.3891369,0.1473614,0.006129249,0.06138334,0.003334707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1284209,0.6941876,0.09126813,0.01644662,0.06521798,0.004458772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004813273,0.001248673,0.5244759,0.08157385,0.01078029,0.000441723,0.1336654,0.000651648,0.000520404,0.006941992,0.002074728,0.2328122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00560985,0.01421511,0.4690148,0.2106881,0.02490674,0.002591518,0.1912284,0.004260067,0.002382597,0.01173243,0.0624653,0.000905193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7518151,0.1763431,0.0142857,0.01487368,0.000582967,0.02398035,0.001911286,0.00005278833,0.01615506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975973,0.009346096,0.007536622,0.00129296,0.0000789749,0.005323495,0.000253458,0.00001912429,0.0001763026],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4781949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6434786,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3208244464683064,"score_gpt":0.5306071018288727,"score_spread":0.2097826553605663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}