{"id":"W2067210191","doi":"10.1016/j.conengprac.2009.11.007","title":"On quantitative feedback design for robust position control of hydraulic actuators","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Control Engineering Practice","topic":"Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Quantitative feedback theory; Control theory (sociology); Actuator; Robustness (evolution); Plant; Nonlinear system; Control engineering; Robust control; Engineering; Hydraulic cylinder; Hydraulic machinery; Position (finance); Electro-hydraulic actuator; Control system; Computer science; Control (management); Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003539924,0.001941326,0.001621223,0.0007991361,0.000528669,0.001573763,0.001346803,0.001492413,0.003931265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007100962,0.0009027335,0.001058276,0.0006218383,0.001657442,0.00182335,0.001752038,0.001535883,0.0005296476],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001079507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009227528,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00237661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001819832,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984078,0.0004618598,0.00009470401,0.0002667483,0.0006690688,0.00009982248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976637,0.00156682,0.0001854648,0.0001151696,0.0004323889,0.00003641978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002650371,0.0001267099,0.0001469792,0.0009234406,0.0001125048,0.0001538557,0.0003579436,0.7595389,0.02439454,0.1188013,0.002538438,0.0926405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003215921,0.0002390425,0.0001089638,0.00002620541,0.00001913109,0.00002680054,0.00001504807,0.9718553,0.002194535,0.02400011,0.001460422,0.00002226854],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001594039,0.0002818239,0.9960602,0.00009633644,0.00004708039,0.0000290306,0.00001528882,0.00009571399,0.001780489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7564152,0.001922883,0.2310815,0.0004600883,0.0003603769,0.00058983,0.0002109495,0.0003278896,0.008631322],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003931265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0187211,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01782856864915307,"score_gpt":0.2416927608341079,"score_spread":0.2238641921849548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}