{"id":"W2067210765","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.11.015","title":"Is coarse taxonomy sufficient for detecting macroinvertebrate patterns in floodplain lakes?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Environment; Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Taxonomic rank; Species richness; Ecology; Biodiversity; Dominance (genetics); Taxonomy (biology); Biology; Floodplain; Benthic zone; Invertebrate; Mantel test; Species diversity; Canonical correspondence analysis; Ordination; Relative species abundance; Taxon; Abundance (ecology)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007866049,0.0005567141,0.0008363645,0.002254902,0.0008638807,0.001557038,0.0008847454,0.001652588,0.001259323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03322066,0.0005695153,0.0006859341,0.001593569,0.001050455,0.003480747,0.00124419,0.0006190871,0.0004011287],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000495108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001074702,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0109653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04712097,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971074,0.001022988,0.0005048597,0.0002895783,0.0006575751,0.0004175686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771074,0.009472183,0.005776325,0.001997932,0.004126801,0.001519349],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009552189,0.00001976181,0.9917611,0.00004511008,0.00007272878,0.00002333481,0.0001420589,0.0001570009,0.0005729136,0.00004903976,0.0002696227,0.006791726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007810349,0.0001604295,0.9957646,0.00005309988,0.00006008983,0.0001265211,0.0007297124,0.001687571,0.0004696059,0.0004558116,0.0004687589,0.00001600369],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932666,0.0005875826,0.002664502,0.0005361788,0.00008617657,0.00004425578,0.0005259869,0.00003148553,0.002257278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959962,0.0002396232,0.002999109,0.0001577064,0.0000642603,0.00003542525,0.0003174749,0.000007040514,0.0001832556],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0109653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04160017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03136389132934449,"score_gpt":0.2299715606357369,"score_spread":0.1986076693063924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}