{"id":"W2067337373","doi":"10.1139/x05-284","title":"Using disaggregation to link individual-tree and whole-stand growth models","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Basal area; Tree (set theory); Statistics; Mathematics; Hectare; Pinus <genus>; Loblolly pine; Growth model; Forestry; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Botany; Combinatorics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001212574,0.00007545175,0.0001037118,0.000349174,0.0003422353,0.0001091465,0.0002671796,0.00006471182,0.0001490441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008334624,0.00006866156,0.0000264844,0.0003660427,0.0003347823,0.000361869,0.00008886281,0.0002618983,0.0000396296],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003703963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001952874,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02500651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.416657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987267,0.0000833529,0.0002075008,0.000142585,0.0003875697,0.0004522546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992121,0.00005047662,0.00005849758,0.0001082599,0.00005851523,0.0005121156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004295339,0.00003322742,0.8577825,0.00002494018,0.00003197871,0.0004624777,0.0008562006,0.04078465,0.000160088,0.049196,0.04091442,0.009710492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000382369,0.0002495978,0.8291169,0.00005850741,0.00001461856,0.0000598684,0.0001347608,0.002690193,0.00006285823,0.1567916,0.01031076,0.0001280366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847272,0.0002092959,0.003043622,0.002864785,0.00008235564,0.0002023748,0.000009458648,0.000002356918,0.008858529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974764,0.00001190609,0.001720055,0.00007687383,0.0001053342,0.000002751739,0.00000239274,0.000009586436,0.0005946824],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3916505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9814861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05733362203027736,"score_gpt":0.2948995180991908,"score_spread":0.2375658960689134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}