{"id":"W2067377566","doi":"10.1016/j.scico.2010.11.010","title":"An empirical study on inconsistent changes to code clones at the release level","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science of Computer Programming","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Software evolution; Software release life cycle; Software; clone (Java method); Software quality; Software development; Perspective (graphical); Quality (philosophy); Code (set theory); Empirical research; Source code; Software engineering; Software construction; Programming language; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01541674,0.0003734003,0.0004424987,0.002584822,0.00127061,0.001959332,0.001693081,0.001737807,0.003997073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2800513,0.0005431284,0.0004107082,0.002778576,0.002120249,0.003433886,0.001383774,0.002942611,0.0006066738],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001219415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001300657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003709873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004851873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9814799,0.009311834,0.001894501,0.00202269,0.004602051,0.0006890274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2937554,0.5736138,0.08197597,0.02302686,0.02422729,0.003400643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001266849,0.002319647,0.9624238,0.0002080122,0.0001440347,0.0004646898,0.00793324,0.0005256055,0.001349873,0.001098979,0.0006378362,0.02162756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001278272,0.001767679,0.9791659,0.0001338492,0.0002118056,0.001117451,0.009718454,0.002967691,0.001630935,0.0009333957,0.002181905,0.00004305382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979311,0.0001553547,0.0005937818,0.0001187978,0.000006997066,0.00003189968,0.00009503852,0.00001453752,0.001052499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985579,0.00007305897,0.0006009914,0.00008866614,0.00001086768,0.00002703282,0.0002266213,0.000027627,0.0003872698],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01541674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08153248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06513932518415562,"score_gpt":0.3623689497781702,"score_spread":0.2972296245940146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}