{"id":"W2067501103","doi":"10.1037/a0021642","title":"When benefits outweigh costs: Reconsidering “automatic” phonological recoding when reading aloud.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pronunciation; Phonology; Linguistics; Spelling; Reading (process); Reading aloud; Computer science; Field (mathematics); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Phonological rule; Natural language processing; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001775823,0.0003711497,0.0004107626,0.0005528472,0.0004008256,0.002247172,0.0008891806,0.001208822,0.002525258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01922464,0.0004680786,0.0003758345,0.0004383919,0.002890429,0.008207298,0.001797808,0.001614721,0.0003894709],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008902858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007898603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002128021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00332404,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990964,0.0003967662,0.00004402033,0.0001694771,0.0001773446,0.0001159137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940786,0.003970395,0.0006101892,0.0007570347,0.000349963,0.0002338647],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002484289,0.0004746082,0.05111682,0.001185166,0.0004442572,0.002255238,0.006843916,0.02208668,0.0890097,0.577547,0.003582023,0.2429704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001344214,0.0003981482,0.05331998,0.0001146666,0.0003079962,0.0008661147,0.002496053,0.0316251,0.01622631,0.886406,0.00799776,0.000107328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9066856,0.002704618,0.03809657,0.01007767,0.0001582538,0.0000463561,0.0001661443,0.0001842979,0.04188042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887124,0.0005414458,0.009011002,0.000439022,0.00002899214,0.00002435537,0.0000581081,0.00006976363,0.00111488],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002525258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009391546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1145048448363616,"score_gpt":0.3132946832487727,"score_spread":0.1987898384124111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}