{"id":"W2067543232","doi":"10.4296/cwrj3003227","title":"The Expanding Institutional Context for Water Resources Management: The Case of the Grand River Watershed","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Water Governance and Infrastructure","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Ontario","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Water resources; Corporate governance; Watershed management; Watershed; Drainage basin; Integrated water resources management; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Political science; Business; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Computer science; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002000462,0.000361939,0.0003546885,0.0002364424,0.01017698,0.000855369,0.001739346,0.000195455,0.0001113768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001415078,0.0001567656,0.0003797563,0.0002367459,0.003197678,0.0005508285,0.0001258328,0.0005453855,0.000008918573],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009625911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002372348,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.197648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8990616,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996358,0.0005380173,0.0007045789,0.0003838344,0.0002956919,0.00171986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979488,0.0001693234,0.0002852192,0.000540741,0.0003397094,0.0007162148],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001095339,0.000009588164,0.0009671821,0.00006295595,0.0002774002,0.0004358568,0.9766136,0.0008312288,0.0002038014,0.0004108139,0.0007544832,0.01932359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005182244,0.00005121495,0.0003788992,0.0001865107,0.0001101442,0.001161961,0.01533254,0.00006419099,0.003838321,0.004032265,0.9740349,0.0002907983],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821762,0.001235597,0.00001750783,0.01190482,0.0005280991,0.0007250243,0.00009565641,0.0000242032,0.003292834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906729,0.0005279655,0.00007328356,0.0008627592,0.001471445,0.00005610083,0.00000929008,0.00004484794,0.006281394],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9732804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01333133212960643,"score_gpt":0.2250078582160312,"score_spread":0.2116765260864248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}