{"id":"W2067543232","doi":"10.4296/cwrj3003227","title":"The Expanding Institutional Context for Water Resources Management: The Case of the Grand River Watershed","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Water Governance and Infrastructure","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Ontario","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Water resources; Corporate governance; Watershed management; Watershed; Drainage basin; Integrated water resources management; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Political science; Business; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Computer science; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009814641,0.0001193744,0.0001992088,0.0006117133,0.0107221,0.004049052,0.000887865,0.001006929,0.002580025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002370216,0.0001828841,0.0001910172,0.001585364,0.01495576,0.001683458,0.003688354,0.00114025,0.00008243095],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04113786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03709653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8370298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9522421,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983748,0.000617512,0.00003477504,0.0001201006,0.0002738662,0.0005789062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986297,0.0005061477,0.0001887125,0.0000932941,0.0002125375,0.0003696958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006729257,0.00005632014,0.0335841,0.0001297028,0.0000225163,0.01297675,0.1255182,0.005239882,0.002301814,0.7833072,0.004935095,0.03186113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007633489,0.0001013394,0.1333611,0.0004707885,0.00008444789,0.002462021,0.330015,0.008113011,0.001169694,0.1305827,0.393424,0.0001394424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8515635,0.0007070479,0.004128916,0.01467517,0.00003388248,0.00007863381,0.00006559839,0.00002717454,0.1287201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947256,0.0003179441,0.0008376412,0.000166012,0.000006860745,0.00001710375,0.000013599,0.000004095742,0.003911002],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1629702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3278599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01333133212960643,"score_gpt":0.2250078582160312,"score_spread":0.2116765260864248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}