{"id":"W2067576397","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19435.x","title":"The equilibrium population size of a partially migratory population and its response to environmental change","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oikos","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Cyanistes; Abundance (ecology); Population; Environmental change; Population size; Population cycle; Population density; Ecology; Geography; Density dependence; Population growth; Population decline; Biology; Demography; Climate change","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002532612,0.00007817808,0.00007123663,0.00001144094,0.00009288553,0.00001124566,0.0000906341,0.00003962691,0.006505704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007584823,0.00006229378,0.00002646501,0.00007680884,0.00004785077,0.0001412941,0.0001153394,0.00003178437,0.0002362985],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001651349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001325147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003646178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003853603,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992737,0.00007413112,0.0001482949,0.0001533107,0.0001924239,0.0001581617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996578,0.00004690662,0.00006795139,0.0001427081,0.000002634422,0.00008199814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009334235,0.0001288773,0.7799488,0.000008259261,0.000008995523,0.00000308745,0.002989649,0.000002939974,0.2095106,0.0004810515,0.0008055934,0.005178731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001351419,0.00008635443,0.9918949,0.000003721228,0.000006174938,0.0000016879,0.0003361504,0.00006498172,0.004618589,0.0000407769,0.002735597,0.00007595247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984829,0.00007128261,0.000001483091,0.0002992386,0.00007153556,0.0002451254,0.0000492323,0.00001568629,0.0007635115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994312,0.00002226257,0.00001884465,0.0001686802,0.00001655604,0.00003793182,0.00001537169,0.000007310899,0.0002818684],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2119461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944025,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04234375853713863,"score_gpt":0.2433296303445145,"score_spread":0.2009858718073759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}