{"id":"W2067631872","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.043","title":"Rainfall generated stormflow response to clearcutting a boreal forest: peak flow comparison with 50 world-wide basin studies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Wildlife; Université Laval","funders":"Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Structural basin; Clearcutting; Hydrology (agriculture); Watershed; Environmental science; Surface runoff; Logging; Hydrograph; Drainage basin; Base flow; Geology; Geography; Ecology; Geomorphology; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001537309,0.0002383619,0.0005893188,0.0002765905,0.0003074404,0.00001902803,0.0003263582,0.00007319343,0.00006571157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002810169,0.000171018,0.00008937724,0.0003688541,0.0004085258,0.0002138572,0.0003019945,0.0003908355,0.0001209989],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003136341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002850095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001424972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003701321,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979454,0.0003443149,0.0005610666,0.0002836244,0.0003330371,0.0005325959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990016,0.0002630849,0.0003297102,0.0001990159,0.00004331507,0.0001632737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006051826,0.0001913177,0.3330927,0.000009060046,0.0004604564,0.0005954141,0.004489148,0.6391888,0.00109558,0.0000308806,0.01396432,0.0008304633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00727177,0.008661665,0.8524098,0.000126495,0.0003998167,0.0005403185,0.001202873,0.003928246,0.001084417,0.002599831,0.1210296,0.0007451173],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710786,0.000172315,0.001702085,0.02546983,0.0002159673,0.0001889748,0.000001214675,0.00002632916,0.001144685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985682,0.00003983,0.00996378,0.003756322,0.0001031778,0.000009276997,0.000001303555,0.00002077244,0.0004235918],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6352605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6973912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01746609895733621,"score_gpt":0.2656908766202966,"score_spread":0.2482247776629604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}