{"id":"W2067631872","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.043","title":"Rainfall generated stormflow response to clearcutting a boreal forest: peak flow comparison with 50 world-wide basin studies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Wildlife; Université Laval","funders":"Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Structural basin; Clearcutting; Hydrology (agriculture); Watershed; Environmental science; Surface runoff; Logging; Hydrograph; Drainage basin; Base flow; Geology; Geography; Ecology; Geomorphology; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005367627,0.0001760173,0.0001469847,0.0006504674,0.0003180393,0.0003926902,0.0002127293,0.0002421068,0.0006039988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009331302,0.000123424,0.0003481597,0.000717473,0.0002524109,0.0003367633,0.0002167078,0.0001685246,0.00006326303],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005193385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002656963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02687795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05729116,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998438,0.00005326451,0.0000147516,0.00003515832,0.00002385433,0.00002905213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993704,0.0002382195,0.0001607716,0.00004796,0.00008329245,0.00009950544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000631997,0.0001361565,0.9946049,0.00001170943,0.000103821,0.00009309158,0.0002129768,0.0007581625,0.001138625,0.00003382278,0.00009766145,0.002177117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008575412,0.00007543812,0.9991832,6.33303e-7,0.00002798362,0.00003579804,0.0001116823,0.0003351525,0.0001594637,0.000007501416,0.00005291188,0.000001606447],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997364,0.00001180558,0.00001828222,0.000003150161,8.823776e-7,0.000001583602,0.000117843,0.000001393061,0.0001087573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996551,0.0000124834,0.00002622335,0.00000298587,0.000001978683,0.000002146214,0.0002538332,7.855268e-7,0.00004440687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02687795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05344301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01746609895733621,"score_gpt":0.2656908766202966,"score_spread":0.2482247776629604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}