{"id":"W2067675266","doi":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.06.007","title":"Is newer always better? Re-evaluating the benefits of newer pharmaceuticals","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Economics","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs","keywords":"Observational study; Replicate; Actuarial science; Medicine; Test (biology); Economics; Econometrics; Statistics; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02685975,0.0008207822,0.002470703,0.002388384,0.0006326528,0.006210044,0.001413035,0.002479318,0.009492391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1611529,0.0003506209,0.001784094,0.002025296,0.001755317,0.008987145,0.001438112,0.00352141,0.0007211696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004399311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004006796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007208672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00904707,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9829419,0.01028952,0.001457279,0.000787582,0.003866604,0.0006571102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8337677,0.1215925,0.01881226,0.005962557,0.01693805,0.002926901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02949114,0.0009818653,0.08390126,0.005529433,0.008804914,0.001211268,0.000987713,0.01956797,0.002263045,0.07093997,0.07487547,0.701446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005821648,0.01078009,0.2576493,0.01231605,0.03361995,0.002750136,0.007828539,0.05726779,0.01317965,0.2866206,0.311353,0.000813401],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4193552,0.2484516,0.006956581,0.2534398,0.006798781,0.0003123917,0.00552741,0.0001227783,0.05903543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9690596,0.01708874,0.002207451,0.006708642,0.00316409,0.00002996434,0.0003517872,0.00003711092,0.001352685],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9731402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1420496,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.243692680031206,"score_gpt":0.4171541290715302,"score_spread":0.1734614490403242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}