{"id":"W2067921518","doi":"10.1897/01-194","title":"An overview of the use of quantitative structure-activity relationships for ranking and prioritizing large chemical inventories for environmental risk assessments","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","topic":"Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Risk assessment; Hazard; Stressor; Environmental science; Adverse Outcome Pathway; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental resource management; Environmental health; Computer science; Ecology; Business; Biology; Medicine; Machine learning; Computational biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002673656,0.001604634,0.002193587,0.007533371,0.0003138429,0.001489984,0.001316163,0.0008449277,0.003953574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00325866,0.0006690807,0.001102059,0.008125143,0.0005456156,0.002051161,0.0005182844,0.0009550347,0.002472179],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001268651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001623711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003840651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004764215,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987825,0.0003178752,0.0001528636,0.0001613899,0.0005436983,0.0000417071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979133,0.001331219,0.0002425846,0.00007203839,0.0004106478,0.00003018831],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004088163,0.00009152585,0.0007734958,0.0169893,0.0001738949,0.0001426013,0.00007070917,0.004717754,0.003197079,0.009941877,0.009118943,0.954742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004191088,0.0004425941,0.006138315,0.008174043,0.0004748539,0.001682001,0.000204672,0.004001556,0.005827813,0.01698866,0.9558731,0.0001504138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001293498,0.9612957,0.02638829,0.000329166,0.0001699452,0.0001969108,0.0004327732,0.0001517744,0.009742027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005881527,0.9539222,0.03681443,0.0001853739,0.00009970376,0.0002113603,0.0004029459,0.00002416774,0.002458288],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007533371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01413983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1557578448206415,"score_gpt":0.3657670948832599,"score_spread":0.2100092500626183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}