{"id":"W2067970085","doi":"10.1007/s10806-011-9356-9","title":"Legal and Ethical Apprehensions Regarding Relational Object. The Case of Genetically Modified Fish","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Pluralism (philosophy); Object (grammar); Opposition (politics); Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Human animal; Environmental ethics; Computer science; Political science; Ecology; Law; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002452265,0.00008313976,0.00009839954,0.00001140483,0.0001014564,0.000008312004,0.00005073068,0.0002246836,0.000005212256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006311842,0.00004565227,0.00006092075,0.00001940964,0.000184983,0.00000459582,0.00008171685,0.0005286058,1.462058e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004920631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000115985,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001045377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001589325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994477,0.00005206384,0.0002150066,0.00009032791,0.0001120226,0.00008290249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997033,0.00005589456,0.00008692969,0.00005982775,0.00002282434,0.00007115099],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001363645,0.00007651134,0.001494101,0.00004794684,0.0001933226,0.00008646947,0.00254959,0.002262759,0.9872172,0.003598087,0.0004640862,0.001873501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002239586,0.001821262,0.7561616,0.0001302231,0.0004227429,0.03994457,0.01074895,0.0005145784,0.1830854,0.001015644,0.003256832,0.0006586124],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972891,0.0006422595,0.001117055,0.0006453043,0.00005531169,0.0000415245,0.000007813902,9.962937e-7,0.0002006301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970174,0.0009504435,0.001712349,0.0001769149,0.00009137216,6.931529e-7,0.000006917958,0.000004066915,0.00003978842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8041318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2296558,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02091586096435828,"score_gpt":0.2547138973754888,"score_spread":0.2337980364111306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}