{"id":"W2067992529","doi":"10.1139/x03-020","title":"Substitution between floor constructions in wood and natural stone: comparison of energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and costs over the life cycle","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Demolition; Natural gas; Environmental science; Forest floor; Energy consumption; Life-cycle assessment; Carbon footprint; Environmental engineering; Waste management; Natural resource economics; Engineering; Production (economics); Economics; Ecology; Civil engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004358746,0.0003759124,0.0002952385,0.00066761,0.0002236885,0.0005477334,0.0002818214,0.0002160495,0.001502282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001226758,0.0001651243,0.0007661259,0.000963927,0.000370379,0.0005173269,0.0002886697,0.0001535237,0.00019798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001122393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006176311,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008732047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03178796,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995,0.0001168924,0.00001920825,0.00005228394,0.000202939,0.0001087396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995195,0.0002468112,0.0001120827,0.00004153904,0.00005364162,0.00002639838],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01006366,0.0006609231,0.3949747,0.00101515,0.0006700301,0.002708495,0.0008006946,0.183087,0.1120264,0.007231124,0.0007946237,0.2859671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001855624,0.01022837,0.7998144,0.0001861663,0.0007967534,0.002177133,0.003286581,0.07360679,0.08260157,0.00273902,0.0242089,0.0001687199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979649,0.000269075,0.0005199552,0.000006496825,0.000003270375,0.000007167182,0.00007082841,0.000003102853,0.001155286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973706,0.0003428088,0.001401022,0.000004309086,0.000001508871,0.000006429587,0.000247386,0.000005229711,0.0006206741],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008732047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01736248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02582965566117639,"score_gpt":0.3142633213488315,"score_spread":0.2884336656876551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}