{"id":"W2068001199","doi":"10.1109/icsm.2013.24","title":"Combining Static and Dynamic Analyses to Reverse-Engineer Scenario Diagrams","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sequence diagram; Computer science; Reverse engineering; Static analysis; Unified Modeling Language; Source code; Java; Programming language; Class diagram; Program comprehension; Dynamic program analysis; Instrumentation (computer programming); Use Case Diagram; Static program analysis; Activity diagram; UML tool; Applications of UML; Software engineering; Software; Software system; Software development","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004571468,0.001816784,0.0006601464,0.00474131,0.0007354064,0.002516142,0.0009775823,0.001043616,0.003798524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01869308,0.0009249724,0.002060823,0.001224137,0.001024444,0.003159902,0.002298101,0.001946765,0.001899552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008821603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002172365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002485704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004355046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946785,0.001831833,0.000366388,0.0006188465,0.002211426,0.000293007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983841,0.008609004,0.001099892,0.003556176,0.002716255,0.0001776846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001970485,0.0003415665,0.007553197,0.0008584938,0.0002818492,0.001738014,0.002455888,0.1272458,0.1053989,0.1125072,0.004208932,0.637213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005808964,0.0002328497,0.002291761,0.0004395134,0.0002802825,0.001576884,0.0006613216,0.6206654,0.1574612,0.1278026,0.08831919,0.000210835],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004199403,0.00004005967,0.9925727,0.00007540047,0.00001897779,0.00007474588,0.00006150451,0.001918202,0.001039013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07697418,0.0001804154,0.9193478,0.00007755627,0.00002134959,0.0001301108,0.0004827692,0.001308665,0.001477208],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00474131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02417654,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02648140674206771,"score_gpt":0.3058633727790844,"score_spread":0.2793819660370166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}