{"id":"W2068038277","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01219.x","title":"Effect of a major canopy disturbance on the coexistence of <i>Acer saccharum</i> and <i>Fagus grandifolia</i> in the understorey of an old‐growth forest","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Beech; Understory; Maple; Canopy; Aceraceae; Shade tolerance; Biology; Ecology; Botany","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001995613,0.00008681421,0.0002936575,0.00005051142,0.00007001011,0.000002183507,0.0002494326,0.00006585895,0.00002291929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002546598,0.00004626106,0.00005478647,0.0001498549,0.000676267,0.00006883994,0.00004325444,0.0001858947,0.000001017765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005452586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001188838,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001086924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01006069,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989436,0.0002638305,0.0003965637,0.00009099001,0.0001496774,0.0001553591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975936,0.001714072,0.0005212427,0.0001115926,0.00003169572,0.00002772835],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005002394,0.0001557919,0.9922844,0.00003247059,0.0000340017,0.00001735314,0.001773592,0.0002643345,0.001874496,0.002829975,0.0001348279,0.00009850226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009398084,0.002291953,0.9914727,0.00002084575,0.00004247684,0.00004280755,0.000418454,0.00009429099,0.002236159,0.002377911,0.00001576086,0.00004682622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978887,0.0001357833,0.00003556189,0.0007321885,0.000108881,0.0001696795,0.000003526076,8.279583e-7,0.0009248605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99945,0.0000721268,0.00006217493,0.000377092,0.00001232669,0.000003232674,2.995661e-7,0.000003711285,0.00001901806],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009951998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5614101,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006859707276936927,"score_gpt":0.240172315410325,"score_spread":0.2333126081333881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}