{"id":"W2068038277","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01219.x","title":"Effect of a major canopy disturbance on the coexistence of <i>Acer saccharum</i> and <i>Fagus grandifolia</i> in the understorey of an old‐growth forest","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Beech; Understory; Maple; Canopy; Aceraceae; Shade tolerance; Biology; Ecology; Botany","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001971318,0.0002507291,0.0002148939,0.0002493723,0.0004270303,0.0005167609,0.0002383471,0.0002471556,0.0007157745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003883659,0.0001284958,0.0002175521,0.000116274,0.000328438,0.0001671262,0.0003008813,0.0003175209,0.00009968628],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005489478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026592,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00809045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01687403,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998976,0.00002071619,0.000008887484,0.00002228423,0.00001313069,0.00003739644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991927,0.0001652165,0.0001921917,0.00002167808,0.00004607105,0.000382084],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009664318,0.002193202,0.6228912,0.000109513,0.0003790735,0.001583029,0.0005594105,0.0008702814,0.3527997,0.00006823605,0.0002722125,0.00860984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002083422,0.002227658,0.9923759,0.000003223639,0.00002903102,0.0001859897,0.0002497599,0.0007345731,0.003992056,0.00001206313,0.0001621812,0.000006735154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998763,0.00002098628,0.000009951059,0.000002734874,0.000001663068,0.000002063116,0.00001446896,0.000001340538,0.00007046918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997619,0.00001664741,0.00004693293,0.00001432696,0.000002824381,0.000002838763,0.00007047947,8.668015e-7,0.00008319977],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00809045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0160867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006859707276936927,"score_gpt":0.240172315410325,"score_spread":0.2333126081333881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}