{"id":"W2068129224","doi":"10.1007/s00355-010-0448-7","title":"Strategic, sincere, and heuristic voting under four election rules: an experimental study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Heuristics; Cardinal voting systems; Bullet voting; Approval voting; Ranked voting system; Anti-plurality voting; Disapproval voting; Heuristic; Economics; Microeconomics; Public finance; Simple (philosophy); Condorcet method; Mathematical economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Politics; Macroeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00812469,0.0007768561,0.0009297698,0.0006822938,0.001151232,0.002123658,0.0009602161,0.001607882,0.007978105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03817255,0.0004413937,0.0005114038,0.0005405353,0.002497694,0.001315872,0.0008264824,0.002088764,0.0006422459],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000867718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008981862,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009928766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001340956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964895,0.002249974,0.0002303881,0.0003122717,0.0003842796,0.0003336794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9325811,0.05284799,0.005243127,0.006608822,0.001017686,0.001701334],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","study_design_scores_codex":[0.128617,0.3153463,0.1845407,0.0009768506,0.001845075,0.0007286259,0.01441055,0.04001815,0.05827339,0.1038053,0.006508351,0.1449297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04224735,0.2015025,0.2901877,0.000235484,0.001777736,0.001079295,0.01176634,0.231188,0.02871966,0.1818304,0.008807304,0.0006581848],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980738,0.00001383342,0.0003257685,0.00005021559,0.00001299483,0.00007124786,0.00002589153,0.000003939158,0.001422342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997207,0.00003811048,0.001114576,0.00005207427,0.00002731755,0.0002088385,0.00007469781,0.000008314769,0.001269149],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00812469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04296798,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05610738286484872,"score_gpt":0.3623805933636797,"score_spread":0.3062732104988309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}