{"id":"W2068129605","doi":"10.1139/x10-110","title":"The impacts of changes in federal timber harvest on forest carbon sequestration in western Oregon","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Subsidy; Natural resource economics; Forest management; Carbon flux; Carbon sink; Carbon fibers; Environmental science; Tonne; Carbon offset; Business; Agricultural economics; Agroforestry; Forestry; Environmental protection; Ecosystem; Climate change; Economics; Geography; Ecology; Carbon dioxide","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005722441,0.0001537639,0.0001608112,0.000370751,0.0006149869,0.00135986,0.0004514115,0.0002816374,0.002911537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00130177,0.0001245878,0.0002822611,0.0004478825,0.0005144047,0.0009282433,0.0006002657,0.0003910122,0.0001146228],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003828526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001694774,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1904942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3665956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997239,0.0000527149,0.00001316359,0.00003941171,0.00007926285,0.00009168574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994698,0.0001723625,0.0001679229,0.00003643974,0.00008614537,0.00006737219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001038214,0.0008307796,0.8252463,0.0001060297,0.0002427188,0.001106083,0.0008138318,0.09319175,0.009443609,0.01405922,0.003513665,0.05040774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001117098,0.0004396053,0.8509073,0.00005491271,0.0001878832,0.0002997243,0.004960269,0.1161904,0.007425238,0.007882035,0.01146845,0.00007258826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931204,0.00005965877,0.0002700814,0.0002638851,0.000004184934,0.00000789391,0.0002895653,0.00002087538,0.0059635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983589,0.0000907958,0.0002010083,0.0000374376,0.000002643968,0.000005261831,0.0001794419,0.000004574227,0.001119894],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1904942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3787708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03523279358023871,"score_gpt":0.3158160724591268,"score_spread":0.2805832788788881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}