{"id":"W2068129605","doi":"10.1139/x10-110","title":"The impacts of changes in federal timber harvest on forest carbon sequestration in western Oregon","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Subsidy; Natural resource economics; Forest management; Carbon flux; Carbon sink; Carbon fibers; Environmental science; Tonne; Carbon offset; Business; Agricultural economics; Agroforestry; Forestry; Environmental protection; Ecosystem; Climate change; Economics; Geography; Ecology; Carbon dioxide","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001960593,0.0001012693,0.0001366774,0.0004839217,0.0001318339,0.0001336029,0.00047667,0.00008716597,0.0001866746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003098265,0.000072869,0.00003433482,0.0005038041,0.0004550763,0.0002006139,0.00004226102,0.0007755444,0.0000463946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003188915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003126266,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1719359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983586,0.0001394956,0.0002913146,0.000121592,0.000483747,0.0006052587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991129,0.0001505579,0.000113114,0.0002227837,0.00003935876,0.0003612863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004161555,0.00001822963,0.9950735,0.000007763349,0.000003401746,0.0001013488,0.0004308432,0.0008436273,0.0002980474,0.001013357,0.001292475,0.0008757755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003373731,0.0003461344,0.990586,0.0000645776,0.000001169472,0.00001298202,0.00004635016,0.0002982951,0.0001994572,0.0009076074,0.007128889,0.00007111093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834419,0.00002120107,1.67884e-7,0.002858936,0.0001403167,0.0002139307,0.000002501082,0.000001250371,0.01331982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984093,0.00002982557,0.00001415226,0.00004710424,0.0001280198,0.000006129208,0.000002145884,0.00001267156,0.001350691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8221415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8335783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03523279358023871,"score_gpt":0.3158160724591268,"score_spread":0.2805832788788881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}