{"id":"W2068282103","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2006.03.003","title":"Evaluation of in situ layers for treatment of acid mine drainage: A field comparison","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Research","topic":"Mine drainage and remediation techniques","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Tailings; Sulfate; Chemistry; Environmental chemistry; Effluent; Total organic carbon; Acid mine drainage; Sulfide; Pulp (tooth); Environmental engineering; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006478599,0.0004427502,0.0004820817,0.0003401901,0.0006555329,0.0004983287,0.0004837861,0.0006100301,0.001547212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009477472,0.0001945759,0.0003719004,0.0003430296,0.0002108573,0.0006737618,0.0003106386,0.0003544125,0.0001869675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004349666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002846471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002072294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004437296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996063,0.0001375813,0.00003675214,0.00008416387,0.00009684838,0.00003834666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992591,0.0002070577,0.00009025838,0.0000718334,0.0003273985,0.00004437645],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001257311,0.0004127464,0.001925445,0.0001464908,0.0000192833,0.00002181068,0.0001260365,0.0005870624,0.9876522,0.00004846185,0.00005988824,0.007743185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005721982,0.003466278,0.007244986,0.000009940157,0.00006717178,0.00007006589,0.0002348177,0.001705978,0.9856256,0.00006344556,0.001445217,0.000009268188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934741,0.0002340006,0.004682804,0.00003800355,0.00002082295,0.00008729265,0.0002116306,0.00003541928,0.001215952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872355,0.0005490133,0.008525671,0.00005852512,0.00001506399,0.0000773659,0.0002637181,0.00003555949,0.003239547],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002072294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005175948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09115518270054569,"score_gpt":0.4007519035789137,"score_spread":0.309596720878368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}