{"id":"W2068282103","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2006.03.003","title":"Evaluation of in situ layers for treatment of acid mine drainage: A field comparison","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Research","topic":"Mine drainage and remediation techniques","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Tailings; Sulfate; Chemistry; Environmental chemistry; Effluent; Total organic carbon; Acid mine drainage; Sulfide; Pulp (tooth); Environmental engineering; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001731419,0.00004517771,0.0001127642,0.0001010353,0.00002497337,0.000004698973,0.00008628974,0.00004151488,0.0003352907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005301999,0.00002994841,0.00003175008,0.0001247556,0.00006642215,0.00004662761,0.00003739776,0.00002666976,0.00001160326],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001025326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002278053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001649683,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987875,0.0001387104,0.0001939385,0.0001223513,0.0005852075,0.0001722597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997347,0.00003099519,0.00002701306,0.0001319644,0.00005918727,0.00001611904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003818585,0.0003052902,0.005553402,0.0000160759,0.000003461746,6.548211e-7,0.001247859,0.0002039078,0.9769844,0.00003962522,0.00142941,0.0141777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000564672,0.000508956,0.002688728,0.000006362378,0.000006488703,1.430174e-7,0.000116677,0.00215611,0.9891505,0.003434338,0.001333623,0.0000334306],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860836,0.0000508833,0.0002758744,0.0004140697,0.000009212897,0.0006683409,0.000002292603,0.000005366071,0.01249039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986305,0.000004406863,0.0005758569,0.00000358883,0.00001642155,0.0001361972,0.00002248957,0.000003939548,0.0006066437],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01414427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3671198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09115518270054569,"score_gpt":0.4007519035789137,"score_spread":0.309596720878368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}