{"id":"W2068400905","doi":"10.1504/ijarge.2001.000015","title":"Understanding the approaches for accommodating multiple stakeholders' interests","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Agricultural Resources Governance and Ecology","topic":"Cooperative Studies and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Typology; Stakeholder; Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Knowledge management; Process (computing); Process management; Management science; Stakeholder analysis; Conflict resolution; Conceptual framework; Business; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03194762,0.001150119,0.0008416646,0.007996016,0.008989939,0.01875878,0.005047758,0.005682193,0.004514796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02307348,0.0006865262,0.001401745,0.006483811,0.0443305,0.03256097,0.01226403,0.005474599,0.0005879519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01253327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009153685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004735985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008182293,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9670683,0.02541475,0.001013678,0.001695816,0.003527137,0.001280317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752262,0.018163,0.001845154,0.002108794,0.001865676,0.0007912551],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006737218,0.00001432129,0.0004459402,0.0001946225,0.00001073691,0.0001726965,0.0241005,0.001068227,0.0001116509,0.9536273,0.0006939634,0.01955315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007772794,0.00001233437,0.000179386,0.0002657314,0.000007126094,0.0001431559,0.02964406,0.002285134,0.0001426982,0.9326524,0.03464385,0.00001637842],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03016667,0.005240446,0.7289099,0.03674971,0.0004507951,0.0006533724,0.00008477584,0.000126279,0.197618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5852743,0.004062816,0.3939295,0.002223655,0.0002016316,0.001427369,0.0001121761,0.00007822041,0.0126903],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03194762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1689572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1731852440314712,"score_gpt":0.2478888448519,"score_spread":0.07470360082042876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}