{"id":"W2068448004","doi":"10.2514/1.c033093","title":"Internal Drag Evaluation for a Through-Flow Nacelle Using a Far-Field Approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aircraft","topic":"Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Nacelle; Drag; Internal flow; Parasitic drag; Aerodynamic drag; Wave drag; Drag divergence Mach number; Aerospace engineering; Mechanics; Lift-induced drag; Airframe; Aerodynamics; Drag coefficient; Computational fluid dynamics; Flow (mathematics); Computer science; Physics; Engineering; Turbine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002553894,0.0005854908,0.000447208,0.001142344,0.0004297219,0.0006603728,0.0004995163,0.0004766856,0.001657768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006671174,0.0001674768,0.0004500633,0.0002476129,0.0003802461,0.0007994956,0.0004329568,0.0003594485,0.0003960564],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003479518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004539891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002533901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002501867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998417,0.00002407532,0.000007936004,0.00002244088,0.0000854939,0.00001828386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999749,0.00007445916,0.00002644414,0.00002169478,0.0001085499,0.0000198103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001441804,0.0002277162,0.004735953,0.0002801697,0.00003356835,0.0004899984,0.0001869078,0.7662462,0.07215185,0.01033143,0.001380278,0.1437919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007626084,0.00007851952,0.00113628,0.00001525023,0.000006402323,0.00009412543,0.00003983948,0.9920282,0.00513683,0.0004825421,0.0009535346,0.00002087909],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2084386,0.0007864001,0.7729095,0.0001097465,0.0001687465,0.0001414134,0.0001010234,0.0006581902,0.01668657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9013246,0.0004899885,0.09264029,0.00005743571,0.0000578758,0.00004944458,0.0001243516,0.00008376642,0.005172249],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002533901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005545735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04293490059496807,"score_gpt":0.2912256861832522,"score_spread":0.2482907855882842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}