{"id":"W2068448004","doi":"10.2514/1.c033093","title":"Internal Drag Evaluation for a Through-Flow Nacelle Using a Far-Field Approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aircraft","topic":"Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Nacelle; Drag; Internal flow; Parasitic drag; Aerodynamic drag; Wave drag; Drag divergence Mach number; Aerospace engineering; Mechanics; Lift-induced drag; Airframe; Aerodynamics; Drag coefficient; Computational fluid dynamics; Flow (mathematics); Computer science; Physics; Engineering; Turbine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005823171,0.0001008601,0.000172257,0.00008269987,0.00003152947,0.00004636669,0.0001289098,0.00005701361,0.000009880896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000116951,0.00009379661,0.0001250446,0.00009630744,0.00000878576,0.0002192936,0.00001978315,0.0001542202,0.000001827774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002197749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001266041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006055583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004809839,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990618,0.0000208055,0.0003514689,0.00007311626,0.0003602293,0.0001325845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992375,0.00007612942,0.00009511002,0.00007244261,0.0004428697,0.00007590043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004056005,0.00003485525,0.00008788895,0.00002082051,0.00006878168,0.00000247995,0.0004255925,0.9916048,0.0007608431,0.0002403073,0.002043036,0.004670015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009140234,0.0001360369,0.00007344054,0.0000358491,0.00005414244,0.0001172323,0.0001434614,0.9923215,0.00006492213,0.004366256,0.001671928,0.0001011889],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2221674,0.0004106573,0.7757228,0.0000884113,0.0005989374,0.0001126625,0.000003451646,0.00001120052,0.0008844662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8163607,0.000016312,0.1831201,0.00005543086,0.000378134,0.000003011306,0.000006595048,0.00002375096,0.00003600372],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5941933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3824915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04293490059496807,"score_gpt":0.2912256861832522,"score_spread":0.2482907855882842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}