{"id":"W2068480654","doi":"10.1063/1.2274412","title":"Evaluation of quantum correlation functions from classical data: Anharmonic models","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Chemical Physics","topic":"Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Welch Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Anharmonicity; Quantum; Correlation function (quantum field theory); Statistical physics; Nonlinear system; Correlation; Centroid; Function (biology); Quantum correlation; Quantum mechanics; Mathematics; Physics; Quantum dynamics; Quantum discord; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001123172,0.0004728754,0.0006391269,0.0005330045,0.0004478156,0.0006913128,0.001115157,0.000751064,0.001598657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003462319,0.0002069074,0.000223699,0.0006842333,0.0006434626,0.001373489,0.0005923415,0.0009504484,0.0002175843],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000989082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001295508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00494573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003326512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996293,0.0001153629,0.00001574816,0.00003202945,0.0001729743,0.00003459762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986852,0.0007267529,0.0001049592,0.0002093135,0.0002049645,0.00006868099],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001648385,0.0002139054,0.001289906,0.0002032947,0.00005161974,0.0001766935,0.0002002311,0.8708844,0.03014939,0.07130598,0.0005960698,0.02476368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005392292,0.000009435821,0.0001069554,0.000002528792,0.000001571919,0.000005167027,0.000005091715,0.9945816,0.003348913,0.001813052,0.0001127271,0.000007520676],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.462225,0.0003026178,0.5291274,0.0002354786,0.0000530986,0.0001095275,0.000191823,0.0007273027,0.007027793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9426529,0.0002166767,0.05545628,0.00003056139,0.00001425041,0.00008372046,0.000141501,0.0001433178,0.001260735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00494573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009833872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06555984495544374,"score_gpt":0.3005396372629222,"score_spread":0.2349797923074785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}