{"id":"W2068581460","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2009.01.004","title":"Multi-jurisdictional environmental impact assessment: Canadian experiences","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Winnipeg","funders":"University of Manitoba","keywords":"Harmonization; Jurisdiction; Standardization; Negotiation; Process (computing); Business; Environmental impact assessment; Public participation; Environmental planning; Process management; Public consultation; Environmental resource management; Environmental economics; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Law; Economics; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008748523,0.0005096787,0.0005008135,0.003701407,0.0100108,0.004718434,0.002448658,0.001592567,0.005096089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01041786,0.0003376909,0.0006404372,0.01264078,0.002019229,0.00176143,0.004228368,0.001674316,0.0002622906],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07642385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1836365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9872395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928972,0.0008234809,0.0002664626,0.000403042,0.004564783,0.001045121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813972,0.002936099,0.0006482343,0.0004132072,0.01175032,0.002855021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005175602,0.0009534465,0.07004665,0.003019614,0.000340846,0.003817811,0.0413361,0.007137717,0.003597702,0.04004721,0.1693905,0.6597949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008463208,0.0001848018,0.168611,0.0009226724,0.0001845987,0.000792981,0.05099302,0.001081013,0.001139403,0.003566384,0.7723041,0.0001354296],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.418521,0.1109274,0.005817449,0.09489649,0.001204986,0.001120375,0.00489099,0.0002585846,0.3623627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8597419,0.07465009,0.009179831,0.008160936,0.0001878952,0.0002476721,0.001784867,0.0001130669,0.04593381],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9235761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5544965,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0127481152586309,"score_gpt":0.3446379580462673,"score_spread":0.3318898427876364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}