{"id":"W2068928172","doi":"10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00437-7","title":"Quasi-experimental longitudinal designs to evaluate drug benefit policy changes with low policy compliance","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Institute on Aging; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Null hypothesis; Compliance (psychology); Econometrics; Policy analysis; Population; Medicine; Longitudinal study; Public economics; Economics; Actuarial science; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1999679,0.002695962,0.003516935,0.001618695,0.00222951,0.002157074,0.00459573,0.005983486,0.01783471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4175856,0.002242933,0.004168892,0.001686894,0.006326817,0.004909816,0.00309509,0.005409332,0.001300953],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002516805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004870793,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003068174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001632073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7134476,0.2636434,0.006317983,0.009343266,0.004958836,0.002288965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3280939,0.5898111,0.03838794,0.03721156,0.004581933,0.001913634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.3641982,0.06844285,0.1201945,0.006030109,0.04460322,0.001101492,0.005473643,0.05583623,0.003744051,0.1867049,0.01210322,0.1315676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.1794129,0.1652354,0.06328942,0.0009982529,0.02239003,0.0006516939,0.002081457,0.3002244,0.006122053,0.2478546,0.01113656,0.0006031806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.6554205,0.002377397,0.3054382,0.005300937,0.00277525,0.01893277,0.004751682,0.001062795,0.00394046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8800169,0.0003448738,0.07627441,0.001736773,0.0003249126,0.03729219,0.001154518,0.00007023242,0.002785126],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8000321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.986582,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7124647347952494,"score_gpt":0.6126733016475715,"score_spread":0.09979143314767791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}