{"id":"W2069004923","doi":"10.1063/1.2001147","title":"Nanomechanical resonance studies of carbon nanotube peapod bundles","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Physics","topic":"Carbon Nanotubes in Composites","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon nanotube; Materials science; Transmission electron microscopy; Diffraction; Resonance (particle physics); Aspect ratio (aeronautics); Electron diffraction; Composite material; Modulus; Fullerene; Mechanical resonance; Bending; Nanotechnology; Optics; Chemistry; Vibration; Atomic physics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001776855,0.0001775453,0.0001359254,0.00029886,0.0002513538,0.0001296003,0.0001660652,0.0002279655,0.0009229589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004305427,0.0001428686,0.0001209764,0.0001609115,0.0001658382,0.0002808652,0.0001484225,0.000229872,0.0002671884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001350801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003894556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002933051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003583673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999849,0.00001868839,0.000007587795,0.00003021469,0.00006647674,0.0000279274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996768,0.00009966229,0.00006747727,0.00002468596,0.00009065056,0.00004065624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001055793,0.000005604412,0.0001357855,0.0000101377,0.000001804177,0.00003287064,0.00003825468,0.00006922126,0.9990571,0.00003700539,0.00001090491,0.0005907523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008282089,0.0003196927,0.006680834,0.000007312096,0.00001004076,0.0002346164,0.0001037069,0.004283301,0.9867972,0.00007672009,0.001469212,0.000009106649],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961927,0.0004090156,0.002504446,0.00002736806,0.000008582267,0.000007830021,0.00003889633,0.00002860679,0.0007826131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959427,0.0002182624,0.002827146,0.00001981026,0.000006526366,0.00001219117,0.00007831703,0.00001180126,0.0008833029],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0009229589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00308758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02412592447949497,"score_gpt":0.2790573749417908,"score_spread":0.2549314504622959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}