{"id":"W2069004923","doi":"10.1063/1.2001147","title":"Nanomechanical resonance studies of carbon nanotube peapod bundles","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Physics","topic":"Carbon Nanotubes in Composites","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon nanotube; Materials science; Transmission electron microscopy; Diffraction; Resonance (particle physics); Aspect ratio (aeronautics); Electron diffraction; Composite material; Modulus; Fullerene; Mechanical resonance; Bending; Nanotechnology; Optics; Chemistry; Vibration; Atomic physics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005559598,0.0001920861,0.0006276613,0.0000640732,0.00005764541,0.00002663376,0.0004741608,0.00006812019,0.00001410368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005071196,0.0001591617,0.0001632252,0.0002315297,0.0002001787,0.0001409207,0.0001753745,0.0002094584,0.00001008774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001175342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001046413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002933205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000284574,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981085,0.00003836946,0.0007834863,0.0001945858,0.0006298638,0.0002452122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982738,0.0002959377,0.000724287,0.0003126184,0.0003193989,0.00007389085],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002155444,0.0001968463,0.00002761467,0.00004107206,0.00004138995,0.000004318456,0.0005940894,0.002775142,0.9802408,0.01279446,0.0002223477,0.002846365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006252729,0.0001796639,0.00004540374,0.000111226,0.00006563622,0.00002163322,0.0001930502,0.0005418965,0.9859475,0.01102968,0.001070729,0.0001682536],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947652,0.002288985,0.0001204259,0.0001071527,0.0005165883,0.0001033381,0.000007631345,0.00001924388,0.002071483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988553,0.0002193627,0.009898596,0.000099372,0.001169728,0.000004023839,3.594345e-7,0.00002393915,0.00003160805],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00977817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6490427,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02412592447949497,"score_gpt":0.2790573749417908,"score_spread":0.2549314504622959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}