{"id":"W2069074275","doi":"10.1109/smartgridcomm.2011.6102353","title":"A game-theoretical decision-making scheme for electricity retailers in the smart grid with demand-side management","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Smart Grid Energy Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Stackelberg competition; Smart grid; Procurement; Electricity; Electricity market; Demand response; Grid; Game theory; Electricity retailing; Computer science; Scheme (mathematics); Environmental economics; Demand side; Business; Operations research; Microeconomics; Marketing; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006110376,0.0002177132,0.0001865384,0.0001973789,0.00005037891,0.0000422911,0.0004065179,0.00005486613,0.0001416854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002956243,0.0001437894,0.00006716284,0.0004378872,0.00006289508,0.0001023614,0.00006765685,0.0001496458,0.00002568241],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009415383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005596484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008351767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009460531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986461,0.00003066999,0.0002760751,0.0002825941,0.0002869077,0.0004776357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992382,0.0002212585,0.00002400775,0.0004468777,0.00002352315,0.00004612951],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005185574,0.0002112417,0.008568228,0.0002510888,0.0004687172,0.0002045671,0.001026745,0.04900862,0.00003301619,0.9090468,0.0111155,0.01954694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004839513,0.0007464326,0.1027828,0.0007666681,0.0003928139,0.00006938586,0.002067714,0.7643994,0.002315805,0.08326671,0.03628409,0.002068661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1892047,0.00006389996,0.6427103,0.00007202537,0.0002704326,0.0009198937,0.0000013783,0.0003218263,0.1664355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.944068,0.00003454575,0.05513919,0.0003022758,0.00006278618,0.0002973926,0.00000305256,0.00004280184,0.0000499492],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8257801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5863562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01068065075803674,"score_gpt":0.2075209571288451,"score_spread":0.1968403063708084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}