{"id":"W2069115213","doi":"10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.05.007","title":"Stability of combined imperfect conical tanks under hydrostatic loading","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Constructional Steel Research","topic":"Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Conical surface; Structural engineering; Buckling; Hydrostatic equilibrium; Finite element method; Hydrostatic pressure; Materials science; Residual; Water tanks; Geotechnical engineering; Mechanics; Engineering; Composite material; Mathematics; Marine engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004058658,0.0003890438,0.000771423,0.0006358984,0.0009238053,0.001523161,0.0006705604,0.001186107,0.002893447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001804626,0.0004426379,0.0004036023,0.0003626214,0.002716183,0.001054637,0.001876671,0.0006103753,0.0003472574],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001050202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001113887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005976731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002757479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997297,0.00003705612,0.000009745756,0.00004670834,0.00009277811,0.00008400738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992956,0.0002141589,0.0001594712,0.00005073628,0.0001587434,0.0001212013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006104312,0.00007082238,0.002182273,0.00004310425,0.00003472467,0.0003742235,0.000178149,0.9501953,0.02419118,0.01691697,0.0006288674,0.004574026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002031184,0.00005445522,0.000933748,0.000003822474,0.000005706572,0.00002693082,0.00009255207,0.9943632,0.002121285,0.002246725,0.0001151257,0.00001626575],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9492823,0.0001027753,0.03018613,0.0004285455,0.00006018935,0.00002631738,0.0001331392,0.0001418621,0.01963868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978357,0.00001976347,0.0003736386,0.00001223527,0.000004707536,0.000006425621,0.00002260395,0.00000966176,0.00171524],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005976731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01188391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03326437485171763,"score_gpt":0.3338004197089858,"score_spread":0.3005360448572682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}