{"id":"W2069285500","doi":"10.1016/j.jim.2013.04.008","title":"Coupled affinity and sizing chromatography: A novel in-process analytical tool to measure titer and trend Fc-protein aggregation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Immunological Methods","topic":"Protein purification and stability","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Monoclonal antibody; Sizing; Titer; Affinity chromatography; Chromatography; Size-exclusion chromatography; Quality by Design; Protein aggregation; Chemistry; Antibody; Biology; Biochemistry; Enzyme; Particle size; Immunology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001120867,0.001358978,0.0008598812,0.0008957881,0.0006054715,0.001153651,0.00205435,0.0009678759,0.002219522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001324194,0.0007160556,0.000540388,0.0006737399,0.0007446188,0.0007482975,0.0009570572,0.002424839,0.001915475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007471524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001053385,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003692314,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984909,0.0002123862,0.00007685716,0.0002554832,0.0008509426,0.0001133182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985433,0.0004440922,0.0001603095,0.0002533488,0.0004186092,0.0001802911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003972974,0.00005004476,0.0001830614,0.00002911673,0.00001125545,0.00001757851,0.00002482478,0.00004159815,0.9936138,0.0001605797,0.0002580304,0.005570463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000776247,0.00006337203,0.0005598259,0.000002104627,0.00002102772,0.0001307508,0.000006376745,0.003334919,0.9937471,0.00007764504,0.002035917,0.0000130188],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2059779,0.001392413,0.7822783,0.0005415988,0.0002844439,0.0005435618,0.0007053797,0.004544113,0.003732197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4469992,0.001669465,0.5226156,0.001079445,0.0002624301,0.0006878925,0.002339614,0.001166959,0.02317934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002219522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00742507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03283006226472862,"score_gpt":0.3378349950355226,"score_spread":0.3050049327707939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}