{"id":"W2069328321","doi":"10.1108/13590790810866881","title":"Insider trading in China: the case for the Chinese Securities Regulatory Commission","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial Crime","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Insider trading; Enforcement; Commission; Business; Alternative trading system; Insider; Insider threat; Government (linguistics); Accounting; Agency (philosophy); Securities fraud; Finance; Law and economics; Economics; Algorithmic trading; Law; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005967896,0.00013258,0.0002247478,0.00009506795,0.0005036563,0.00006238601,0.0002595481,0.00005214828,0.00001837511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003798488,0.00007053731,0.0001552252,0.0003566275,0.00009097657,0.0008236639,0.00004166542,0.0002871795,0.000003199346],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003437109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009178837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004686295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003450867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991267,0.00001146942,0.000403954,0.00009026025,0.0001844121,0.0001832048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990163,0.0001230041,0.0005565606,0.0001574262,0.0001383045,0.000008348183],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001881561,0.0006149281,0.3280204,0.0005574928,0.00007082614,0.01097045,0.005848081,0.001188447,0.0008021751,0.05388556,0.5561017,0.04005832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000827722,0.00002484972,0.9243016,0.0001017938,0.00002475143,0.0008377375,0.00009824237,0.0007679173,0.00002169515,0.005427311,0.06745438,0.0001120371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941834,0.001609277,0.0002439069,0.002275714,0.0006611712,0.0001698111,0.000003087513,0.000007361143,0.0008462524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963111,0.00008756359,0.00003617212,0.0008993961,0.00244352,0.000006258985,4.140719e-7,0.00001422385,0.0002013612],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5962811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3873768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02250140181859227,"score_gpt":0.2360492828879379,"score_spread":0.2135478810693456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}