{"id":"W2069338364","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.09.007","title":"Tools for the prioritization of substances on the Domestic Substances List in Canada on the basis of hazard","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"Health Canada; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Hazard; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk assessment; Mandate; Prioritization; Hazard analysis; Weighting; Population; Computer science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Work (physics); Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Operations research; Business; Environmental health; Engineering; Process management; Environmental science; Computer security; Medicine; Political science; Reliability engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003884945,0.00009834839,0.0001631144,0.0000129675,0.0001860719,0.000005058379,0.000206856,0.00005771019,0.0005299862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004090145,0.00005236488,0.00003134096,0.0001153503,0.0005039128,0.00006144835,0.00002222542,0.0001204869,0.000001033358],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002026274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005723163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003115936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08099984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991151,0.0002147079,0.0001999605,0.0001399658,0.000145009,0.0001852483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979128,0.001805546,0.0001408766,0.0001070765,0.000004319573,0.00002943453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001781718,0.001193078,0.4384112,0.00006796175,0.0002956535,0.00002705499,0.003582719,0.01304889,0.3945597,0.04939413,0.02152389,0.07611409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004901754,0.0003648798,0.942192,0.00001105327,0.00003915257,0.00000192587,0.0006217896,0.0003726772,0.05209501,0.002332673,0.00139254,0.00008609643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925382,0.0002619855,0.000006460727,0.00568862,0.0002081549,0.0005017339,0.00001670723,0.000002358441,0.000775775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996438,0.0002351414,0.000008610875,0.003179937,0.00002751131,0.00004027174,0.000001618847,0.000003816423,0.00006514168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5037808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9357695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02157185090635215,"score_gpt":0.2978851088029932,"score_spread":0.276313257896641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}