{"id":"W2069394074","doi":"10.1016/j.jprocont.2007.05.006","title":"Constrained minimum variance control using hybrid genetic algorithm – An industrial experience","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Process Control","topic":"Fault Detection and Control Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Genetic algorithm; Variance (accounting); Control (management); Minimum-variance unbiased estimator; Algorithm; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Control theory (sociology); Engineering; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Statistics; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007205252,0.0003615475,0.0005840003,0.0002422714,0.0003273873,0.0007049469,0.0005579115,0.000932496,0.000788952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001215714,0.0002164714,0.0002927908,0.0004527341,0.0003527798,0.0004167993,0.0003175121,0.0005236678,0.00009458781],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004163343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005425559,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007471781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00505396,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996593,0.0001377325,0.00001114349,0.00003996457,0.0001321006,0.00001958715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992981,0.0004739588,0.0000260671,0.00005450968,0.000133304,0.00001406606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003338525,0.0002899092,0.0007813795,0.00009489665,0.00008136828,0.00009767342,0.0001198058,0.7567395,0.01254226,0.006650127,0.0007558367,0.2215134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003397081,0.0001389235,0.0003699951,0.000004125259,0.00001320332,0.00002135246,0.00001008687,0.9955265,0.002398697,0.0008702861,0.0006018011,0.00001112459],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.253023,0.001085629,0.7334692,0.0002245767,0.00006327953,0.0000698064,0.0000218441,0.0003730345,0.01166963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8633901,0.0002289562,0.1333712,0.00005043511,0.00001365233,0.00004134195,0.00002513049,0.00004348321,0.002835593],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007471781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01485658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0159817492702824,"score_gpt":0.2609290274206965,"score_spread":0.2449472781504141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}