{"id":"W2069413888","doi":"10.1139/p03-090","title":"Some remarks on Dirac's hole theory versus quantum field theory","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physics","topic":"Algebraic and Geometric Analysis","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Dirac (video compression format); Quantum field theory; Relationship between string theory and quantum field theory; Quantum mechanics; Equivalence (formal languages); Theoretical physics; Field (mathematics); Field theory (psychology); Dirac equation; Quantum; Mathematical physics; Quantum gravity","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001136558,0.0001726325,0.0003560745,0.0002737999,0.000170309,0.0000443346,0.0002828806,0.0001063189,0.0006090052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003785623,0.0001447719,0.0003041643,0.0004814775,0.0000887763,0.0001735291,0.000007271436,0.00044006,0.00004772684],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001488529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007952792,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009421015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002539083,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986393,0.0002537845,0.0003563678,0.0001316051,0.0002705515,0.0003483179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966552,0.001954942,0.0003304978,0.0003289461,0.0001641122,0.0005662929],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006430044,0.0000355838,0.00007353689,0.00001124111,0.0002449684,0.00008009284,0.0004392836,0.00004055068,0.000004950939,0.9820402,0.01015245,0.006812894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005898086,0.0002959282,0.00003387345,0.00005010819,0.0002277251,0.000009865847,0.001168043,0.00002367957,0.0005876154,0.9915561,0.005274358,0.0001828662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6280966,0.008860759,0.2111522,0.002652047,0.007720364,0.0005745764,0.00008245626,0.00007664486,0.1407843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967274,0.00003756633,0.0005403004,0.0007126708,0.0006045318,0.000001050008,0.000001286103,0.00002984889,0.001345327],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3686308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.666818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02723085217787131,"score_gpt":0.2661269005122023,"score_spread":0.238896048334331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}