{"id":"W2069445136","doi":"10.1007/s11069-011-9823-7","title":"A comparative analysis of several vulnerability concepts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Hazards","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":236,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Victoria University of Wellington; Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst; University of Victoria","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Vulnerability assessment; Natural hazard; Interdependence; Adaptation (eye); Context (archaeology); Resilience (materials science); Scale (ratio); Adaptive capacity; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Environmental resource management; Psychological resilience; Geography; Climate change; Sociology; Environmental science; Computer security; Psychology; Ecology; Business; Social psychology; Cartography; Social science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003700727,0.0000714308,0.000248408,0.0001137643,0.0001473506,0.00001689499,0.0002830755,0.00004556992,0.0008806605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000522013,0.00005619397,0.0001472355,0.0009663648,0.0005595093,0.0002110659,0.0000497061,0.00009733196,0.00001397824],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003712927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005121291,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001743644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003557888,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989434,0.0001827558,0.0001578076,0.0001720091,0.0003576233,0.0001864083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995362,0.00005261343,0.00008363272,0.0001423214,0.0001298447,0.00005542637],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003473692,0.0006667991,0.1409834,0.00004600305,0.002925915,0.00001331849,0.5786966,0.0002723977,0.0004108642,0.2342225,0.007446844,0.03396806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004257386,0.00009100546,0.9493122,0.00001464388,0.0007688311,1.008666e-7,0.03008201,0.004755139,0.0006283707,0.002067569,0.0115023,0.0003521338],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7389658,0.00009093827,0.00006749976,0.00005567722,0.00022699,0.0001119903,0.000005291351,0.00002776743,0.2604481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954314,0.00000634012,0.0003204371,0.00006035296,0.00003012984,0.000003464505,0.00000408784,0.000001285708,0.004142468],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8083288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9642615,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04886823894262719,"score_gpt":0.378912023003955,"score_spread":0.3300437840613278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}