{"id":"W2069514097","doi":"10.1063/1.3624530","title":"Accurate determination of the Gibbs energy of Cu–Zr melts using the thermodynamic integration method in Monte Carlo simulations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Chemical Physics","topic":"Material Dynamics and Properties","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Thermodynamics; Monte Carlo method; Thermodynamic integration; Gibbs free energy; Internal energy; Work (physics); Materials science; Statistical physics; Chemistry; Physics; Molecular dynamics; Computational chemistry; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009849702,0.0004918344,0.0006421115,0.0007012696,0.0005165009,0.0004468452,0.0008135309,0.0006027271,0.000979299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002362248,0.0004099372,0.0003987941,0.0005279238,0.0005622754,0.0006326266,0.0003947041,0.0007198643,0.0001962158],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000852124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001055807,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004299609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004527621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997138,0.00008960418,0.00001551205,0.00002543224,0.0001270565,0.00002861181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994295,0.0003638134,0.00003866432,0.00007141346,0.00007943274,0.00001701288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005580193,0.00003927227,0.0009979188,0.00007427097,0.00002787845,0.00006109216,0.00005870562,0.9392529,0.02025732,0.02985602,0.00016238,0.009156462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003090492,0.000005365149,0.0001204474,0.000002710578,0.000002314136,0.000004540897,0.000002523228,0.9960382,0.002467016,0.001180595,0.0001696822,0.00000358407],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2570938,0.0004878147,0.735518,0.0001267992,0.00004231909,0.0001194397,0.0002241046,0.0006550906,0.005732692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8601217,0.000293851,0.137689,0.00002795657,0.00001990218,0.0003142225,0.0002165342,0.0002404264,0.001076401],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004299609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008549154,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04709850775083465,"score_gpt":0.2885424499834084,"score_spread":0.2414439422325737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}