{"id":"W2069583645","doi":"10.1093/icon/mor055","title":"Nonproblematic judicial review: A case study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Conceptualization; Political science; Icelandic; Law; Technocracy; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01454121,0.0005592006,0.0007371763,0.002156143,0.01519133,0.006420648,0.002545953,0.01118732,0.003320253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02817163,0.0005634,0.0009065571,0.00385564,0.006011731,0.00201823,0.004143951,0.005698297,0.0006379079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005907517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005008072,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01399569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9839761,0.009792363,0.0007649773,0.000923539,0.002129118,0.002413862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9685956,0.02214995,0.003911744,0.001506069,0.001880491,0.001956207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004870144,0.005438246,0.0998858,0.001130127,0.000187457,0.4303382,0.08045521,0.004379879,0.002404079,0.2444255,0.0362666,0.09460191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007664001,0.002347521,0.135655,0.002487023,0.0003443473,0.3225598,0.1844588,0.01062393,0.00343499,0.04632327,0.2905764,0.0004225958],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8824379,0.009635452,0.004367359,0.01950025,0.000366731,0.0005700102,0.0001162553,0.00003499473,0.082971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977211,0.007130328,0.003510706,0.004077047,0.0004949896,0.0002467102,0.00006727073,0.00002909448,0.007232902],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01519133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07690221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07757805518062609,"score_gpt":0.3637788328078143,"score_spread":0.2862007776271882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}