{"id":"W2069669352","doi":"10.1117/12.863546","title":"Dispersion compensation for optical coherence tomography","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE","topic":"Optical Coherence Tomography Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Optical coherence tomography; Optics; Compensation (psychology); Optical tomography; Dispersion (optics); Simulated annealing; Filter (signal processing); Time domain; Optical filter; Frequency domain; Materials science; Computer science; Physics; Computer vision; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002859137,0.0003873912,0.000257167,0.0004297634,0.0003327895,0.0003916867,0.0003535008,0.0007192811,0.001784567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009392389,0.0001959378,0.0001763401,0.000750053,0.0003805054,0.0005379495,0.0003025903,0.000537573,0.0007381014],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007966286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004235118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009292742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001717653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996706,0.00004922641,0.00001086796,0.00006251698,0.0001887873,0.0000180815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997284,0.00009234554,0.00004725355,0.00003266989,0.00008956293,0.000009824634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002212991,0.00006749776,0.0009707528,0.0005310533,0.00005301583,0.0001787755,0.0001202742,0.03968701,0.6030351,0.05644267,0.00571152,0.2929811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006510668,0.0002552635,0.002052109,0.0001835731,0.00007788773,0.0007803033,0.00004913901,0.3169793,0.5235378,0.02413066,0.1317543,0.0001345503],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04263394,0.02201498,0.914183,0.001141422,0.0004157025,0.00009332951,0.0002140886,0.001223815,0.01807983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3931458,0.00978532,0.5859848,0.0003407036,0.0002441966,0.0001006736,0.0003321744,0.0002248217,0.009841557],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001784567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005969942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0104969949123441,"score_gpt":0.2278384648235386,"score_spread":0.2173414699111945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}