{"id":"W2069830184","doi":"10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.06.017","title":"Determination of the morphology of soot aggregates using the relative optical density method for the analysis of TEM images","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Combustion and Flame","topic":"Combustion and flame dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"University of Illinois at Chicago","keywords":"Soot; Fractal dimension; Aggregate (composite); Laminar flow; Fractal; Materials science; Diffusion; Number density; Fractal analysis; Mineralogy; Chemistry; Nanotechnology; Thermodynamics; Combustion; Physics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003039713,0.0003230541,0.00029639,0.0007088606,0.0002975633,0.000335787,0.000310817,0.0002286141,0.001217358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004899545,0.0002070752,0.0001795672,0.0003266229,0.0002148916,0.0004123372,0.0001427458,0.0005491624,0.0004311539],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002239346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001406632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009871169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001878828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998788,0.0000131843,0.00001022361,0.00002300047,0.00006228812,0.00001245508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995106,0.0001027282,0.00006584873,0.00004819527,0.0002390507,0.00003346916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001907934,0.000005494766,0.000146596,0.00001762102,0.000002476319,0.00000982452,0.00001785838,0.00002680026,0.998341,0.0001097433,0.00002778446,0.001275825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001959576,0.00004798681,0.004232286,0.000003124773,0.000009670099,0.0001216567,0.00002667691,0.002090395,0.9922621,0.00004932571,0.001150481,0.000004215092],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8540227,0.001303037,0.1376409,0.00009702423,0.0000898576,0.0001418677,0.0008732997,0.0004914024,0.005339861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8313683,0.002138219,0.1573895,0.00008637115,0.00002763849,0.0001502946,0.001587835,0.0002559617,0.006995889],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001217358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004072487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01668612763435655,"score_gpt":0.2758840207827896,"score_spread":0.259197893148433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}