{"id":"W2069830184","doi":"10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.06.017","title":"Determination of the morphology of soot aggregates using the relative optical density method for the analysis of TEM images","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Combustion and Flame","topic":"Combustion and flame dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"University of Illinois at Chicago","keywords":"Soot; Fractal dimension; Aggregate (composite); Laminar flow; Fractal; Materials science; Diffusion; Number density; Fractal analysis; Mineralogy; Chemistry; Nanotechnology; Thermodynamics; Combustion; Physics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003672745,0.00007337968,0.0001942078,0.00008138872,0.00007426053,0.000006295442,0.0001072462,0.00006105888,0.000008945909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001566815,0.0000415289,0.0001303192,0.0003126039,0.0001924955,0.0000495879,0.00003766653,0.0001003804,1.239199e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002350759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008548804,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001186419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003833299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994547,0.00006651412,0.0002420211,0.00007654692,0.00008532228,0.00007494351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988723,0.0006756193,0.0001213501,0.0001853489,0.0001316886,0.00001370189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009513016,0.00008515987,0.00687647,0.0001447055,0.0008829669,4.10524e-7,0.00264744,0.732322,0.0821191,0.0244151,0.00007625073,0.1503352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001744952,0.0000121446,0.03456785,0.00001507794,0.0006697174,0.000003767527,0.000183082,0.9476932,0.01627379,0.0003305666,0.00003187794,0.00004445838],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3870447,0.0001918868,0.6122531,0.0002600851,0.00005764347,0.0001326795,0.00001258405,0.000009575194,0.00003777015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811179,0.00006532954,0.01872829,0.0000192258,0.00001472874,0.000003653171,0.000003792676,0.000006236922,0.00004083242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5940732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1693499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01668612763435655,"score_gpt":0.2758840207827896,"score_spread":0.259197893148433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}