{"id":"W2069853660","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2012.06.017","title":"Potential distribution of emerald ash borer: What can we learn from ecological niche models using Maxent and GARP?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Ecology and Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Emerald ash borer; Agrilus; Fraxinus; Range (aeronautics); Environmental niche modelling; Ecological niche; Niche; Ecology; Species distribution; Invasive species; Habitat; Introduced species; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002969025,0.0006212438,0.0008548619,0.0006556973,0.0005427271,0.001291907,0.002364121,0.001111028,0.003606386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01066225,0.0005001273,0.0008977494,0.000597271,0.0008586522,0.005145857,0.0007562573,0.0009952191,0.0006092727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008077869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005993593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01368386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01981933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995989,0.0002568282,0.00001428675,0.00006623858,0.00002373023,0.00003996578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996145,0.002912973,0.0002311759,0.0002699649,0.0001604647,0.0002803964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001510273,0.00009594189,0.0711183,0.0001854457,0.0002837239,0.0001949458,0.0003137638,0.8704491,0.0005478073,0.0241434,0.004544291,0.02797219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001801835,0.00001380643,0.005897096,0.00002215802,0.00002995814,0.00007553722,0.0001732539,0.9502871,0.0001153306,0.04224648,0.001096164,0.00002506294],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9000067,0.001426447,0.0820851,0.005999949,0.00009108066,0.00001303652,0.001746194,0.0005732857,0.008058322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984948,0.0003904862,0.01315324,0.0002540828,0.00005683038,0.00001693043,0.0004904559,0.0001521233,0.0005378958],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01368386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02720839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02566161822390114,"score_gpt":0.2345793401700452,"score_spread":0.2089177219461441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}