{"id":"W2069853660","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2012.06.017","title":"Potential distribution of emerald ash borer: What can we learn from ecological niche models using Maxent and GARP?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Ecology and Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Emerald ash borer; Agrilus; Fraxinus; Range (aeronautics); Environmental niche modelling; Ecological niche; Niche; Ecology; Species distribution; Invasive species; Habitat; Introduced species; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000152094,0.0001137711,0.000146684,0.00001612951,0.000146841,0.00002781388,0.00008100777,0.00009802329,0.004186329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004744751,0.0001009767,0.00003363616,0.00005868759,0.0002334662,0.0002544131,0.0004178424,0.0000687383,0.00002534549],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001764563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001851605,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002331562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009563303,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991447,0.00004713294,0.0001670359,0.0002156728,0.0001132307,0.0003122418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996824,0.00001635378,0.00007749183,0.0001126135,0.00000542111,0.000105766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002145112,0.001442129,0.9119229,0.0001255806,0.0002523787,0.00004609146,0.001049454,0.004265449,0.0008107462,0.04768958,0.02077444,0.01140676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004526635,0.00008092409,0.9828715,0.000008003729,0.00008448482,0.000005104062,0.001222837,0.002480492,0.00005913461,0.002644411,0.009962249,0.000128235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964811,0.0003135069,0.0008851098,0.001058378,0.0002347023,0.0002443407,0.00009056934,0.0000157498,0.0006765708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956648,0.003434722,0.0001236774,0.0003335818,0.00002413443,0.00002040236,0.000246947,0.000004802167,0.0001469789],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07094859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996724,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02566161822390114,"score_gpt":0.2345793401700452,"score_spread":0.2089177219461441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}