{"id":"W2069963480","doi":"10.1007/s11219-005-4253-y","title":"Virtual Software Engineering Laboratories in Support of Trade-off Analyses","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Quality Journal","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung","keywords":"Product (mathematics); Computer science; Software engineering; Software; Quality (philosophy); Software quality; Systems engineering; Empirical research; Software quality control; Engineering; Software development; Process management; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Operating system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002343114,0.0002971707,0.0005608744,0.0006691994,0.0001074299,0.0002231054,0.00141636,0.0001644328,0.00007723877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008157671,0.0002935655,0.0001971332,0.001613725,0.00007929729,0.001304117,0.0002479091,0.0009289332,0.00002222998],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000285912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005380887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002046414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001926241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964014,0.0002202993,0.001082866,0.000404924,0.001175172,0.0007152826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965168,0.001943679,0.0002560396,0.0006738553,0.000277247,0.0003323782],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001001192,0.0008473053,0.6130406,0.0003934261,0.0004118973,0.0004861343,0.01162261,0.1346746,0.003703352,0.006886707,0.009138545,0.2186947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00446357,0.00115085,0.9016685,0.0004731137,0.00005462828,0.0009344105,0.0005399687,0.00534007,0.03047399,0.001149903,0.0512294,0.002521549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3134292,0.0008402742,0.683924,0.0007229507,0.0005111177,0.0001108988,0.0000277793,0.0004278775,0.000005935917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77942,0.00008957035,0.2198149,0.0001935268,0.0003640108,0.00001045494,0.000005720343,0.00004204083,0.00005976296],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4659908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04235531741497253,"score_gpt":0.3502672804459467,"score_spread":0.3079119630309741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}