{"id":"W2070102726","doi":"10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.06.002","title":"Doing good better? The differential subsidization of charitable contributions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy and Society","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Differential (mechanical device); Public economics; Economics; Public finance; Finance; Macroeconomics; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005828729,0.0001897133,0.0003796881,0.0009952631,0.001447177,0.001843496,0.0007009289,0.001006113,0.004988561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02685059,0.0001629369,0.0003114672,0.0007998953,0.006805646,0.001771164,0.002989137,0.001369946,0.0003322104],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002612307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002521389,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002199695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002903798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940288,0.003757913,0.0001219269,0.000436586,0.000947287,0.0007075121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883841,0.005740603,0.00140172,0.002420737,0.001236104,0.0008166386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001942377,0.0003820976,0.01153472,0.0001406473,0.00003358378,0.00009032562,0.001878968,0.004835603,0.001386293,0.8285016,0.005161478,0.1458604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000305302,0.0006490257,0.04508847,0.0005810523,0.0001042151,0.0004077265,0.004384961,0.02083077,0.003758046,0.8356768,0.08815996,0.00005369954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6598524,0.001594784,0.08827855,0.03651768,0.0005680008,0.0002329856,0.00009092615,0.0002429169,0.2126217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948086,0.0001136585,0.003002052,0.0004943181,0.00003148477,0.00004030556,0.000004895521,0.000007441677,0.001497305],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005828729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03082561,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01063833756411823,"score_gpt":0.3067609901586703,"score_spread":0.296122652594552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}