{"id":"W2070157903","doi":"10.1115/ipc2010-31158","title":"Experimental Testing and Evaluation of Crack Defects in Line Pipe","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2010 8th International Pipeline Conference, Volume 1","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"TransCanada (Canada); University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Pipeline transport; Materials science; Fracture (geology); Structural engineering; Cracking; Hydrostatic test; Welding; Tearing; Failure assessment; Nominal Pipe Size; Stress (linguistics); Fracture mechanics; Cylinder; Pipeline (software); Forensic engineering; Composite material; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001041157,0.000672264,0.0003300841,0.000599395,0.0003297061,0.0001452968,0.000645521,0.0007555593,0.002791759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001617401,0.000332792,0.0003101992,0.0004030577,0.0005382041,0.0004871568,0.0006242558,0.0004936921,0.0003539393],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001942676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002029895,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006374403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001074685,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99923,0.0001009195,0.00007254585,0.0001525554,0.000346593,0.00009731734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970425,0.0008208622,0.000446912,0.0004629151,0.001065901,0.0001609227],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002092867,0.0003372885,0.002980096,0.0001893456,0.00000822919,0.0002080384,0.0003310406,0.002864005,0.9866695,0.00009197839,0.0001020084,0.006009193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003469137,0.01325903,0.01420895,0.00003364253,0.00002883353,0.000276631,0.000207622,0.01101766,0.959798,0.00009164361,0.001013834,0.00002949473],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893995,0.0001345445,0.009304099,0.00001863222,0.00001212579,0.000128168,0.0001749216,0.0001413382,0.0006865215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835572,0.0002230713,0.01379808,0.00002113207,0.000005853731,0.0001572277,0.0002808868,0.0000467253,0.001909852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002791759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009339392,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03957758033160295,"score_gpt":0.2922013857212317,"score_spread":0.2526238053896288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}