{"id":"W2070160168","doi":"10.1038/jes.2009.74","title":"Bias in the estimation of exposure effects with individual- or group-based exposure assessment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology","topic":"Air Quality and Health Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"National Cancer Institute; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Statistics; Context (archaeology); Mathematics; Exposure assessment; Logistic regression; Random effects model; Linear regression; Estimation; Econometrics; Variance (accounting); Regression; Observational error; Mean squared error; Medicine; Biology; Meta-analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01797754,0.0003021951,0.000723101,0.0002250894,0.0003305761,0.00002941495,0.001240817,0.0002317357,0.0004534958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001885226,0.0001674781,0.0001296452,0.0006234989,0.002766231,0.0008436036,0.0001623893,0.001145423,0.00001785073],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002978004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002263703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000903109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002126108,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947098,0.001354328,0.001480837,0.0004416664,0.001269321,0.0007439737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994714,0.002717152,0.001653237,0.0005558319,0.00001221796,0.0003475834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002800145,0.0007687221,0.9353312,0.0000469918,0.00001281144,0.00004883233,0.0016433,0.02772758,0.01511511,0.0003792688,0.0002931984,0.01835298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001510522,0.005861471,0.9878018,0.0000726587,0.00004068085,0.0002388984,0.0006522987,0.00104967,0.001255831,0.0007879082,0.0005279951,0.0002002169],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.993103,0.00008605902,0.003118765,0.002658005,0.0003318616,0.0004904782,0.0000104637,0.000007726891,0.0001936596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9582956,0.00003479042,0.03776385,0.003784019,0.00007284619,0.00001668857,0.000006813119,0.00001499401,0.00001039906],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05247066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05980296901384015,"score_gpt":0.3580845230341556,"score_spread":0.2982815540203155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}