{"id":"W2070341805","doi":"10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.419","title":"Judgment dissociation theory: An analysis of differences in causal, counterfactual and covariational reasoning.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Categorization; Outcome (game theory); Counterfactual conditional; Psychology; Causal reasoning; Focus (optics); Contrast (vision); Cognitive psychology; Dissociation (chemistry); Social psychology; Econometrics; Cognition; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Economics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003359204,0.0001171224,0.0005172705,0.000542735,0.0000646154,0.00007969378,0.0002664585,0.00009889594,0.0004811289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005064845,0.00008676776,0.0001316057,0.0004123611,0.0001219577,0.0003153911,0.00002477096,0.0001460697,0.000002311404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008558902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005647929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001470838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002985073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974901,0.0006079799,0.001000661,0.0002634675,0.0004963532,0.0001414117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982111,0.000488015,0.0008731039,0.0001956863,0.0001413992,0.0000907348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005496091,0.001248521,0.9538208,4.313933e-7,0.0003079429,0.00001738325,0.003836739,0.001319147,0.01825445,0.0119472,0.0003710086,0.008326732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019004,0.00120046,0.9578897,0.00001450305,0.0001678751,0.00006589772,0.004205653,0.002310664,0.003243273,0.02862861,0.0001654498,0.00020747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966393,0.0003475286,0.002076685,0.00006791863,0.0005415087,0.00004385123,0.00001280027,0.000001896997,0.0002684795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969503,0.00002554201,0.002752952,0.0001705877,0.00004730701,0.000001548097,0.00000281851,0.00000506777,0.0000438319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01668142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5268024,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1294355886620626,"score_gpt":0.4571402004475097,"score_spread":0.3277046117854471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}