{"id":"W2070449044","doi":"10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.008","title":"Static strength of a composite butt joint configuration with different attachments","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Composite Structures","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Butt joint; Joint (building); Structural engineering; Composite number; Bolted joint; Ultimate tensile strength; Materials science; Composite material; Adhesive; Displacement (psychology); Engineering; Finite element method","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00003727647,0.0003476078,0.0004673267,0.0001389557,0.0000649355,0.00003681238,0.0002771534,0.00008587076,0.0003111826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003430051,0.0002704002,0.0000848757,0.0001280128,0.00008745044,0.0001198186,0.00005254271,0.0002223944,0.00000828309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005195181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009495013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002764954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000794035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985536,0.00005281711,0.0004764403,0.0002524898,0.0003585293,0.000306135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991601,0.00004604089,0.0001279146,0.0004199183,0.00008554692,0.0001605361],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001698027,0.0001270289,0.01021942,0.000250922,0.0002542783,0.00002169827,0.001015909,0.001139402,0.9791123,0.004531281,0.0001489518,0.003009012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007316236,0.0002968145,0.1918363,0.0001064748,0.0001261187,0.00001875527,0.00002540358,0.002501304,0.8026818,0.001311229,0.00003374366,0.0003303756],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848692,0.0001146126,0.01241416,0.00001116675,0.0002153082,0.0003462928,0.00004871651,0.000246833,0.001733636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907087,0.00001072372,0.009070904,0.00002710101,0.0000270521,0.00001765459,0.00007357393,0.0000488707,0.0000154298],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1816169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999748,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0235848804471164,"score_gpt":0.2358903645141025,"score_spread":0.2123054840669861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}