{"id":"W2070449044","doi":"10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.008","title":"Static strength of a composite butt joint configuration with different attachments","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Composite Structures","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Butt joint; Joint (building); Structural engineering; Composite number; Bolted joint; Ultimate tensile strength; Materials science; Composite material; Adhesive; Displacement (psychology); Engineering; Finite element method","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004208123,0.0003879189,0.0002831946,0.0007175154,0.0003330317,0.0003265992,0.0005789497,0.0006178628,0.003902461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007976114,0.0003259923,0.0002952689,0.0003942557,0.0005827359,0.0003123019,0.0002847394,0.0002109404,0.000698685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000249569,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008357494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001259232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996535,0.00005597961,0.00001470481,0.00006444271,0.0001305477,0.00008098296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991502,0.000227715,0.0001028712,0.00008842401,0.0003068771,0.0001239585],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001687168,0.0001034322,0.00240162,0.00006275366,0.00002677257,0.0001829526,0.00007846393,0.007553622,0.9823561,0.000402552,0.0001814271,0.00496309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005066111,0.002239859,0.03255438,0.00002254443,0.0001117548,0.0003060806,0.0002531493,0.02901501,0.9341772,0.0002535387,0.000963711,0.00005211919],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960319,0.0001324008,0.001467421,0.0000132179,0.00001409561,0.000004068592,0.0000865762,0.00003489398,0.002215215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998931,0.00002289044,0.0002963123,0.000007547947,0.000003107714,0.000002169129,0.00005385745,0.000007203174,0.0006758504],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003902461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01305503,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0235848804471164,"score_gpt":0.2358903645141025,"score_spread":0.2123054840669861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}