{"id":"W2070491349","doi":"10.1139/l07-019","title":"Life-cycle cost assessment model for fiber reinforced polymer bridge deck panels","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deck; Bridge (graph theory); Fibre-reinforced plastic; Bridge deck; Life-cycle assessment; Life-cycle cost analysis; Engineering; Reliability engineering; Process (computing); Structural engineering; Computer science; Construction engineering; Civil engineering; Forensic engineering; Production (economics)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003035727,0.0002807539,0.0003543673,0.0004773074,0.00007220441,0.00008289902,0.0003194604,0.0001519798,0.0001970752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001238957,0.000305666,0.00021444,0.0001905871,0.00002446303,0.0003519681,0.000009613024,0.0003959027,0.000005958581],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005161496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006087968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001907555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00134768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982498,0.000003258587,0.0006292232,0.0001163291,0.0002262276,0.0007751704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978244,0.00009853591,0.0001047018,0.0002159065,0.0001519454,0.00160447],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006899657,1.244739e-7,0.00007911655,0.00004884454,0.00007513438,0.00005254386,0.0001742563,0.9887465,0.007698589,0.0005032349,0.0009786442,0.001636094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009260221,0.00005254198,0.006537552,0.0001343422,0.00008446783,0.000208258,0.00002983584,0.9806615,0.007014479,0.00001293238,0.003814861,0.0005232045],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3591767,0.0006862352,0.6364377,0.00007690074,0.001323701,0.0003941969,0.00006023957,0.0001234888,0.001720867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948016,0.00001039611,0.004379111,0.0000853215,0.0003039113,0.000008418056,0.000007974952,0.00009606573,0.0003071882],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6356249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999396,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01707185975675904,"score_gpt":0.2371214854125646,"score_spread":0.2200496256558056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}