{"id":"W2070491349","doi":"10.1139/l07-019","title":"Life-cycle cost assessment model for fiber reinforced polymer bridge deck panels","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deck; Bridge (graph theory); Fibre-reinforced plastic; Bridge deck; Life-cycle assessment; Life-cycle cost analysis; Engineering; Reliability engineering; Process (computing); Structural engineering; Computer science; Construction engineering; Civil engineering; Forensic engineering; Production (economics)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001016749,0.0008677862,0.0007778488,0.0009783882,0.0005503149,0.001204298,0.001918427,0.001546267,0.003958448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001313422,0.0006208068,0.001123262,0.0007258194,0.0004387529,0.001081596,0.0006451769,0.0009748831,0.0006053241],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002891166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002104822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02461011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01421788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995847,0.0001333768,0.00001629104,0.00006379824,0.0001212635,0.0000804113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995732,0.0001899399,0.0000511153,0.00001771615,0.0001448414,0.00002319766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001076489,0.000007294002,0.0001450178,0.000009420983,0.000003969157,0.00002487055,0.0000083989,0.9969469,0.0002641725,0.001226913,0.00008675925,0.001265535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002976421,0.00000850749,0.00009457736,0.00000264102,0.000003626527,0.000006486747,0.000006159383,0.9990276,0.0001291514,0.0004736017,0.0002414134,0.000003187812],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1934345,0.0008158134,0.7606604,0.0008623344,0.00005542656,0.0003819131,0.001724472,0.000532724,0.04153246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9463134,0.0005586942,0.03001356,0.00008747794,0.00001840986,0.0005479696,0.0007271384,0.00008418932,0.02164919],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02461011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04893368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01707185975675904,"score_gpt":0.2371214854125646,"score_spread":0.2200496256558056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}