{"id":"W2070516708","doi":"10.5558/tfc83092-1","title":"Can hybrid poplar save industrial forestry in Canada?: A financial analysis in Alberta and policy considerations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Agriculture Food and Rural Development","funders":"University of Alberta; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Zoning; Taiga; Business; Forest management; Resource (disambiguation); Yield (engineering); Land use; Forestry; Agroforestry; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Geography; Economics; Ecology; Environmental science; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001218526,0.0002882223,0.000323795,0.00230813,0.00330278,0.004511013,0.001063447,0.001181123,0.005062364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004183291,0.0002138127,0.000321035,0.003742489,0.0009680382,0.001012801,0.000814156,0.001082235,0.0001135569],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07348066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09018607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9908359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984761,0.0001067087,0.00002595119,0.00005327704,0.0005983707,0.0007396174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971569,0.0007811836,0.0002719185,0.00003205793,0.0011275,0.0006304646],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009708238,0.0005160517,0.5305862,0.0006240553,0.0002383892,0.003129754,0.002474855,0.0598417,0.002099521,0.2044113,0.06796842,0.1271388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003165426,0.0002536898,0.7734314,0.0004850968,0.0003848793,0.000485262,0.01848997,0.08155,0.001649118,0.02151659,0.1011587,0.0002787276],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8955901,0.004447522,0.0006356922,0.02590463,0.00004746089,0.0001449804,0.005389693,0.00005592306,0.06778405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856273,0.003025342,0.0004948032,0.001065318,0.00002663266,0.00002067638,0.001135482,0.000007632735,0.008596821],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07348066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.533142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01197194175432857,"score_gpt":0.2286086292613677,"score_spread":0.2166366875070391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}