{"id":"W2070616006","doi":"10.1109/tap.2010.2048857","title":"An Efficient Method to Reduce the Numerical Dispersion in the LOD-FDTD Method Based on the (2, 4) Stencil","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Stencil; Finite-difference time-domain method; Dispersion (optics); Diagonal; Limit (mathematics); Mathematics; Numerical analysis; Finite difference method; Algorithm; Mathematical analysis; Computer science; Applied mathematics; Optics; Computational physics; Physics; Geometry; Computational science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002964457,0.0004588042,0.0005097156,0.0004202576,0.0002732521,0.0004400919,0.0005881554,0.0005183853,0.001601592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000648792,0.0002327106,0.0002962044,0.000389748,0.0003192267,0.0004929233,0.0005622212,0.0005099334,0.0005257066],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002992278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005076784,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005021471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009379404,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998643,0.00003218421,0.000009208523,0.0000152381,0.00006653991,0.00001249384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999795,0.0001020566,0.00002320879,0.0000332474,0.00003743007,0.000008994892],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001804858,0.0001507541,0.001556391,0.0006337384,0.00006457644,0.0003577854,0.0003553994,0.3192571,0.2969286,0.04384317,0.004718389,0.3319536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003864892,0.00007238419,0.000307486,0.00002085937,0.00001546199,0.0002244436,0.00002098494,0.9319195,0.04985964,0.003680845,0.01379802,0.00004166926],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009521186,0.0001234044,0.9879578,0.00004255767,0.00003136225,0.00004108025,0.00004997475,0.0004711446,0.001761632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08157063,0.00009031304,0.9165387,0.00003320517,0.00001158488,0.0001397075,0.0001165562,0.0001116904,0.001387566],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001601592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005357921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01722217800439237,"score_gpt":0.2980530533396765,"score_spread":0.2808308753352842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}